Introducing
Prezi AI.
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Loading…
Manroe V Hopkins
10
Transcript
Monroe V Hopkins
Ghada and AlGalia
Outline:
- Introduction
- Facts
- Findings
- Synopsis Rule
- Q & A
- Conclusion
- References
introduction:
Facts:
- Because of the 2015 election demonstrations, a monument was vandalized.
Facts:
- The events were discussed on Twitter with user Penny Read tweeting a photograph of the vandalized memorial.
Facts:
- On May 2015 Miss Hopkins posted two tweets denouncing Penny Reds tweets leading to widespread press coverage of the exchange.
Facts:
- Hopkins sent a tweet of indictment to Monroe instead of Larry Benny. Monroe who was from a family of military connections responded instantly and angrily.
Facts:
- On May 2017 Solicitors acing for Monroe roots a memo to Hopkins that demanded an apology on Twitter and donates charity off 5,000 in form of settlement of the case, also pay the legal expenses because of the damages.
Findings:
£24,000
Findings:
1
2
Synopsis of rule:
- The rule that is application is Defamation.
- Defamation entails slander (spoken), as well as libel (written).
- Section 1 of the Act was a trial by Parliament.
- Vandalizing public monuments amounts to a criminal offense hence the law found Ms. Hopkins to have violated the law.
- The tweets cause suffering and harm on the reputation of miss Monroe.
Questions & Answers :
- Q: Why was Ms. Hopkins’s argument on her intention of tweets was rejected?
- Q: Did Monroe’s tweets reduce the harms created by Ms. Hopkins’s tweets?
- Q: How was this case significant to the Twitter context?
conclusion:
References:
Choose a template
Presentations from around the world
Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi