Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Approaches to Citizenship Education
PhD Candidate, Depart of. curriculum, pedagogy and assessment
"Citizenship education in a Chinese University: the role of ideological and political education"
PhD Candidate, Depart of. curriculum, pedagogy and assessment
"THE PREVENT DUTY AND ITS IMPACT ON ENGLISH
SECONDARY SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES: A VIEW
FROM SCHOOL AND COLLEGE LEADERSHIP"
PhD Candidate, Depart of. curriculum, pedagogy and assessment
"Reimagining democratic citizenship and peace education on the future Unified Korean Peninsula: Lessons from young North Korean migrants ’ life histories"
THE PREVENT DUTY AND ITS IMPACT ON ENGLISH
SECONDARY SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES: A VIEW
FROM SCHOOL AND COLLEGE LEADERSHIP
Government
Driven
Multicultural
Policy
Ethnocentric
Mind-set
Division
Ideology
Reimagining democratic citizenship and peace education on the future Unified Korean Peninsula: Lessons from young North Korean migrants’ life histories
One-size-fits-all
Curriculum
Overarching Question
Subsidiary Questions
I. How do they narrate their experience living in North Korea, as well as when they leave in North Korea?
II. What strategies do they use to enable them to settle down in new and challenging environments?
III. How might this experience be used in informing democratic citizenship and peace education in the context of Korean reunification?
To what extent, can North Korean migrant youths' life experience contribute to develop appropriate democratic citizenship and peace education in order to prepare for a successful reunification on the Korean peninsula?
Values-Bearing Citizens
who advocates for the creative richness of other cultures and integrate cultural differences (Zuckerman,2013;Bennett, 1986; Hammer, 2011)
Who can be a mediator for peacebuilding (Galtung and Jacobson,2002)
who open to utopian perspectives (Rawls,1999)
who have cosmopolitan habitus (Bourdieu, 1986; Weenink, 2008)
who have bridging social capital (Putnam, 1995:2000)
Year of Arrival
(SK)
Year of Arrival
(UK)
Current
Location
Home Town
Social
Classification
Pseudonyms
Age
Affiliation
Sex
Florist
2008
Seoul
Wavering
Class
Kyungsung
N/A
F
31
Geum
21
Seoul
Student
F
2013
Wavering
Class
Hyang
Chungjin
N/A
M
Core
Class
26
Kyungsung
2011
Ju
Seoul
Student
N/A
Gunpo
M
Hamhung
Kweon
F: Core
M: Hostile
Student &
Painter
26
2013
N/A
Surbiton
Chungjin
2003
Hostile
Class
F
25
Student
Hae
2005
HaYoung
Hostile
Class
41
Chungjin
2007
F
2002
New Malden
House wife
Minseok
New Malden
2007
M
19
N/A
2002
Student
Yanbian
(China)
Biographic Narrative Interpretive Interviewing & Digital Autobiographical Writing
South Korea & United Kingdom
Figure 2. The escape routes of refugees to South Korea
Figure 1. The North Korean-Chinese Borderland
Transnational
Citizens
Democratic
Citizens
New Juche
Type People
Undocumented
Citizens
Constitutional monarchy
(Capitalism)
Liberal Democracy
(Capitalism)
Socialism
(Marketisation)
North Korean style socialism
Citizenship education in a Chinese University:
the role of ideological and political education
Flanagan, V. (2014). Digital citizenship in the Posthuman Era (pp.70-99). In Technology and Identity in Young Adult Fiction: The Posthuman Subject. Palgrave Macmillan
Week 1 (17 Jan): Introductory Session
Apple et al (2018) Ch.1. The struggle for democracy in education (pp. 1-19)
Week 2 (31 Jan): Banks et al (2017) Ch. 7 Citizenship Education, Inclusion, and Belonging in Europe: Rhetoric and Reality in England an Norway (pp.133-160)
Week 3 (14 Feb): Apple et al (2018) Ch.6. The Struggle Continues: Lessons Learned and What Can Be Done (pp.135-160)
Week 4 (28 Feb): Flanagan, V. (2014). Digital citizenship in the Posthuman Era (pp.70-99). In Technology and Identity in Young Adult Fiction: The Posthuman Subject. Palgrave Macmillan
Week 5 (14 Mar): Banks et al (2017) Ch. 3 Globalization and Education for Cosmopolitan Citizenship(pp.41-62)
Week 6 (2 May): Discussion with Prof. Hugh Starkey (Topic: TBC)
Week 7 (16 May): Discussion about all topics and Reflection on the reading group (Lesson Learned)
What do you hope that you will learn during this reading group?
What did they say?
The book consists of six chapters:
1. The struggle for democracy in education
2. The Contradictions of a Critically Democratic School
3. Struggling for the Local: Money, Power, and the Possibilities of Victories in the Politics of Education
4. How “Democracy” Can Lead to Inequality: Class Relations and the Realities of Educational Reform
5. Can Critical Democracy Last?: Porto Alegre and the Struggle Over “Thick” Democracy in Education
6. The struggle Continues: Lesson Learned and What Can Be Done.
Apple et al (2018) stress the full of tensions and contradictions in school which led hard to live out its commitments and to democratise the processes and outcomes of education. He started a story of an initiative, which he and his wife, Rima are interested in and it was dedicated to improve the educational inequality of young women and girls who have been suffering from doubly marginalised not only by class but also by gender.
According to Apple and his colleagues, Thick democracy (thicker forms of critically democratic education/ a thick process of full collective participation/ thick vision of democracy) seeks to provide full collective participation in the search for the common good and create critical citizens, who are object to “thin democracy,” market-oriented versions of consumer choice, possessive individualism, and an education that is valued largely as a tool for meeting a set of limited economic needs as defined by the powerful (2018:4-5)
This introductory chapter has drawn on the conflicts over the meaning of democracy and its realities in schools and the local communities. From chapter 2 to 5, those chapters handle the core topic. “Democracy in education is seen as a contested terrain” as observed by neoliberal, neoconservative, authoritarian populist, and new managerial forces and movements, so-called, “conservative modernization” (Apple et al., 2018:15)
Do you agree with the concept of Apple’s “Thick democracy” and “Thin democracy”?
If so, why and why not?
Sub-question
What roles should critical educators play in the politics of building and defending thicker forms of democracy inside and outside of education? (Apple et al., 2018:16)
How democracy is actually lived in schools, in whose vision of democracy is sponsored, and in how movements from below sometimes get formed to oppose dominance (Apple, 2014)
What does critical citizens ( Apple et al.,2018:9) mean in this volume? what's your understanding on the concept of critical citizens ?
We discussed...
with leaders
adam.lang.16@ucl.ac.uk
yaobin.tong.15@ucl.ac.uk