Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Logical Fallacies
Types of reasoning that, although they may look solid on the surface, are actually flawed
However, some authors do employ fallacies on purpose. For example, an author who is passionate about bringing climate change awareness may exaggerate the effects of climate change. This could be seen as a scare tactic and could call an author’s credibility into question
Employing fallacies can undermine the quality of your argument
Oftentimes, you see logical fallacies employed in advertisements for companies
In essence, logical fallacies are mistakes in reasoning
They make you a more astute reader of other arguments
They help you respond to weaknesses in arguments you don’t agree with
They help pinpoint weaknesses you don’t agree with
They help you evaluate the quality of sources
They help you avoid faulty logic in your own arguments
A distraction or side argument that draws attention away from the central issue
An Argument that a claim is true because it has never been proven false, or false because it have never been proven true
An argument based on emotion, not reason
An argument that a claim is valid because the person making the claim is an authority
A call to jump on board because everyone else has. Proposition is claimed to be true or good solely because many people believe it to be so.
An assertion that one small event will set off a barrage of others
An approach to an issue that suggests that there are only two choices
An assertion that because a certain event occurred after another it happened because of the other
A criticism of persons associated with a position as opposed to tenets of the position itself
A conclusion drawn from insufficient information.
A very broad application is applied to a single premise
Occurs when the conclusion of an argument is assumed in the phrasing of the question itself.
When an arguer responds to an argument by not addressing the points of the argument
having the impression of refuting an argument, meanwhile the proper idea of argument under discussion was not addressed, properly refuted, or is distorted. Often, the distorted interpretation is only remotely related to the original claim. The opposing argument may focus on just one aspect of the claim, take it out of context, or exaggerate it.