Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Hadley vs. Baxendale

Case Law Presentation

Parties of the Case

Questions of the Case

  • Hadley - Owner of the Corn Mill

  • W. Joyce & Co. - Manufacturer of the crankshaft

  • Baxendale - Owner of the courier company Pickford & Co.

Important Aspects of the case

  • Can a defendant be held liable for all the direct and indirect damage sustained by the plaintiff?
  • Is the Plaintiff entitled to compensation for the claimed loss of profit because of the defendant's late delivery?

Facts of the Case

Actual image of the

Corn mill

Judgement

Conclusion

Important Components of the Case

The court concluded that a person is entitled to damages arising naturally from the breach itself or those can be reasonably contemplated by the parties at the time of contracting.

Test of Forseeability

Remoteness of Damage

• Acc to the CoE the defendant could not foresee the loss experience by the plaintiff, and hence can’t be held liable for all the damage.

• The court also held that the plaintiff didn’t intimate the graveness of the matter to Baxendale and the fact that the mill would be non-functional till the new part is installed.

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi