Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Sustainable Fashion

Environmental and social impacts of the fashion industry

By Kelly Raynor

Modify Style

Why do your fashion choices matter?

Why do your fashion choices matter?

Pollution

1.6 billion tons of greenhouse emissions

17% - 20% of industrial water pollution comes from textile manufacturing

Agricultural runoff

Energy and

water use

Energy &

water use

8% of global greenhouse gas emissions

Textile production uses the equivalent of 132 million metric tons of coal and 6-9 trillion liters of water annually

How much?

How many gallons of water does it take to produce a typical pair of jeans?

Chemicals

The World Health Organization estimates 1.3 million lives and 43 million disability-adjusted life-years were lost in 2012 due to chemical exposure

Chemicals

Toxic Substances Control Act

Toxic Substances Control Act

  • 1979 all 62,000 chemicals currently in use were grandfathered in
  • Now 84,000 are approved

Tested - .2%

New - 24%

Grandfathered - 74%

I pity the man who wants a coat so cheap that the man or woman who produces the cloth will starve in the process.

~Benjamin Harrison

23rd President of the United States

Labor

Rana Plaza

Rana Plaza

Building collapse killing 1,100 people

Bangladesh Accord created to address systemic safety concerns

2,000 of 8,000 garment factories covered

Four years later 79 factories have passed inspection

Pesticide

Poisoning

Pesticides

Acute pesticide poisoning affects three million people a year

20,000 unintentional deaths

Long-term chronic symptoms are underreported and estimates range from 1 million to 41 million people

Donating isn't a free pass for consumption

Waste

Only 15% of clothing donations are sold directly to second-hand consumers in the United States

  • The rest is sold in bundles and exported
  • May inhibit growth of textile industries of import counties, some African countries have banned imports

Waste

What percentage of landfil waste is textiles?

Nine percent

Environmental Case Studies

Results

Citarum

Citarum River

  • 68% of industrial facilities on the upper Citarum manufacture textiles
  • Outfalls tested
  • Nonylphenol - bioaccumulative, toxic, estrogenic
  • Antimony - inflammation of liver and kidney
  • Tributyl phosphate - inflammation of liver, kidney and bladder, possible birth defects and low birth weight
  • Highly alkaline (pH 14) - more caustic than ammonia or lye

Aral

Aral Sea

  • Water diverted from two rivers for agriculture
  • Water level dropped 23m, salinity in South Aral increased from 10g/l to 100g/l
  • Fish catch
  • 1960: 43,430 tons
  • 1980: 0 tons
  • Six million hectares of arable land lost
  • Decreased rain and snowfall - glaciers shrinking

Fabrics

How to choose?

Fabrics

Cotton

Conventional Cotton

Pros

  • Biodegradable
  • Moderately low energy use
  • High yield

Cons

  • 25% of pesticide use in USA
  • 24% of insecticide use globally
  • 11% of pesticide use globally
  • High water use

Cotton

  • Can take up to 20,000 liters of water to produce 1kg of cotton
  • Organic cotton is only 0.03% of world's cotton production
  • Cotton accounts for a vast majority of pesticide poisonings

Polyester

Polyester

More complicated than you think

Conventional Polyester

Cons

  • Not biodegradable
  • Produces micro-plastics when washed

Pros

  • Very low water use
  • Durable
  • Generally production chemicals are not released into environment

Recycled Polyester

Cons

  • Not biodegradable
  • Produces micro-plastics when washed
  • Costs 15-20% more than virgin fiber
  • Lower grade than virgin polyester

Pros

  • Very low water use
  • Durable
  • Generally production chemicals are not released into environment
  • Uses 70% less energy than virgin fiber
  • Reduces landfill waste

Microplastics

  • Ocean water off the Pacific Northwest coast
  • 200-9,200 particles per cubic meter
  • 70% fiber particles
  • Bind to other toxins in the environment
  • Accumulates in fatty tissue and shellfish

How to reduce microfibers

Consumers

  • Use a Guppy Friend bag
  • Short, gentle wash in cold water
  • Use fabric softener
  • Avoid powder and oxidizing detergents
  • Buy bio-degradable clothing

Makers

  • Explore alternative fabrics like hemp fleece and Lyocell
  • Create demand for fabrics with anti-shed treatments

Sheep

wool

Sheep wool

Cons

  • High direct land use
  • Animal welfare concerns

Pros

  • Biodegradable
  • Low energy and water use
  • Low carbon emission

Cashmere

&

Alpaca

Cashmere

vs

Alpaca

  • Large goat herds in sensitive terrain = extreme environmental stress
  • Cashmere goats are tough on the fragile land
  • Eat very close to the roots, destroying plants
  • Damage topsoil and grass root systems with their stiletto-like hoofs

  • Their feet do not disturb grass root systems, because they have a soft pad similar to that of a dog
  • Do not destroy root systems or land when grazing, trap grass without pulling from the root
  • They do not live in a fragile ecology
  • They consume a small amount of water (compared to goats)

Cellulose Fabrics

Made from wood pulp (and sometimes bamboo)

Lower bacterial count than cotton

Middle of the pack on energy use, water use, carbon pollution

Rayon/Viscose

Rayon/Viscose

Highly toxic manufacturing process - 30% of American workers suffered severe effects

  • insanity
  • nerve damage
  • increased risk of heart disease and stroke

Conflicting studies on biodegradability

Bamboo viscose - no better chemically

Grows rapidly and is naturally regenerating

Improves soil quality and prevents erosion

Needs few pesticides

Absorbs 5 times more carbon and produces 35 percent more oxygen than a similar stand of trees

Modal

Modal

Lower toxin manufacturing compared to viscose

Generally from beech trees

Lyocell/Tencel®

Lyocell/Tencel®

Tencel® is a branded lyocell fabric made from sustainably grown eucalyptus trees

Manufacturing process recovers and reuses up to 99.8% of the solvent

Remaining emissions are broken down in biological water treatment plants

Flax, nettle, bamboo and hemp

Natural Bast Fibers

Half the amount of water and twice the yield per hectare compared to cotton

Doesn't need pesticides and doesn't deplete the soil

  • Low water and energy use
  • Low carbon emissions
  • Mid-range land use

Leather

&

Pleather

Leather

vs

Pleather

  • Durable
  • "Timeless"
  • Tanning uses heavy metals and other carcinogenic chemicals
  • workers often suffer respiratory illness
  • Animal welfare concerns
  • High water use
  • Biodegradable

  • No animals are directly harmed
  • PVC pleather
  • most environmentaly damaging plastic
  • Non-biodegradable
  • PU pleather
  • less toxic to manufacture than PVC or traditional leather
  • can be made to degrade

Silk

Silk

  • Low chemical use
  • Very low yield per acre
  • one shirt/acre compared to cotton 900 shirts/acre
  • Animal welfare concerns
  • Mulberry silk
  • Peace Silk
  • Cruelty free Tussar silk

What can I do?

Show your support!

Support nonprofits

Greenpeace’s Detox program

Physicians for Social Responsibility

Modify Style

How will your clothing die?

Design for reuse

Think about how your clothing can be broken down into it's constituent parts

How long will your designs look timeless?

How long will your clothing last?

Bibliography

Berlin (2010) “My Jeans are Very Thirsty” EPA Blog blog.epa.gov/blog/2010/06/my-jeans-are-very-thirsty/

Challa, Lakshmi (ND) The Impact of Textiles and Clothing Industry on Environment http://www.fibre2fashion.com/industry-article/1709/impact-of-textiles-and-clothing-industry-on-environment?page=1

Chapman (2012) Mistra Future Fashion: Review of Life Cycle Assessments of Clothing www.oakdenehollins.co.uk/media/232/2010_mistra_review_of_life_cycle_assessments_of_clothing.pdf

Claudio, Luz (2007) “Waste Couture: Environmental Impact of the Clothing Industry” Environmental Health Perspectives. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964887/ Retrieved 2015/12/27

Drumond Chequer et al (2013). Textile Dyes: Dyeing Process and Environmental Impact, Eco-Friendly Textile Dyeing and Finishing InTech, DOI: 10.5772/53659.www.intechopen.com/books/eco-friendly-textile-dyeing-and-finishing/textile-dyes-dyeing-process-and-environmental-impact

Farr (2016) Good on You Material Guide: “Is Silk Sustainable?” https://goodonyou.eco/is-silk-sustainable/

Greer (2015) Clean by Design, Apparel Manufacturing and Pollution

https://www.nrdc.org/resources/clean-design-apparel-manufacturing-and-pollution

Hymann (2016) Good on You Material Guide: “How sustainable is hemp?” https://goodonyou.eco/material-guide-hemp/

Jackson (2014) “Assessing the Environmental Impact of the Fashion World” Environmental Leader http://www.environmentalleader.com/2014/10/06/assessing-the-environmental-impact-of-the-fashion-world/

Jones (2017) “How Much Cotton Does it Take to Make a Shirt?” https://www.livestrong.com/article/1006170-much-cotton-make-shirt/

Kayton (ND) Silk Thread and Cloth

http://www.suekayton.com/Silkworms/cloth.htm

KEMI (2014) “Chemicals in Textiles: Risks to Human Health and the Environment”

https://www.kemi.se/files/8040fb7a4f2547b7bad522c399c0b649/report6-14-chemicals-in-textiles.pdf

Kumaresan et al. (2008) “Performance of Large Scale Farming in Sericulture –An Economic Analysis” https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/204606/2/06-Kumaresan.pdf

Meeghan (2013) “Pesticide Poisoning: Confronting the hidden menace” www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/aug/02/pesticide-poisoning-hidden-menace-ghana

Messinger (2016) “How your clothes are poisoning our oceans and food supply”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/20/microfibers-plastic-pollution-oceans-patagonia-synthetic-clothes-microbeads

Natural Resources Defence Council (2012) http://www.nrdc.org/international/cleanbydesign/files/CBD-Fiber-Selection-FS.pdf

O’Connor (2017) “Will clothes companies do the right thing to reduce microfiber pollution?”

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/may/13/clothes-companies-microfiber-pollution

Park, Chung Hee; Kang, Yun Kyung; Im, Seung Soon (2004). "Biodegradability of cellulose fabrics". Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 94: 248. doi:10.1002/app.20879

Pesticide Action Network (2010) “Communities in Peril” http://www.pan-germany.org/download/PAN-I_CBM-Global-Report_1006-final.pdf

Rae (2017) “How Viscose Rayon Fabric Masquerades as Bamboo Clothing” https://bthechange.com/how-viscose-rayon-fabric-masquerades-as-bamboo-clothing-b-the-change-media-89f0e3038179

Statista (2017) Cotton yield per harvested acre in the U.S. from 2000 to 2017 (in pounds) https://www.statista.com/statistics/191494/cotton-yield-per-harvested-acre-in-the-us-since-2000/

Thompson (2008) “The Aral Sea Crisis” http://www.columbia.edu/~tmt2120/environmental%20impacts.htm

University of Plymouth. "Abundance of microplastics in the world's deep seas." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 16 December 2014. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/12/141216212253.htm

WWF (1999) The Impact of Cotton Farming on Fresh Water Resources and Ecosystems

http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/about_freshwater/freshwater_problems/thirsty_crops/cotton/

World Health Organization (2016) “Public Health Impact of Chemicals: Knowns and Unknowns” http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/chemicals-public-health-impact/en/

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi