Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
POPULISM: ALLY OR THREAT TO DEMOCRACY?
There is not an unique defnition, but we can find some elements that characterize it.
Pseudo definition of "ELITE": Who hold the power.
"THE PEOPLE": Who does not hold the power, but gives it.
Populist LEADER:
1) He says that he can shortly resolve the problems that the elite does not solve because they are corrupt.
2) He is part of "the people" and not of "the elite".
3) He has legitimacy and democratic sustain.
He has the power to change what is not justice according to him.
1) More sovranity
2) Back to the borders between States
3) No immigration
4) Destruction of radical Islam
Popper and Hempel
method:
Frequently words:
SOCIOLOGY
1) First impression
2) Concept of one nation
3) Sentiment of fear
MATH and STATISTICS
Pr (POPi t = 1 Xi t ) = F(Xi tβ)
POPULISM
DEMOCRACY
and
CONSTITUTION
Synthesis between
CONSTITUTION
Three populist critiques of liberal constitutionalism:
1) People and Sovreignity
2) Majority Rule
3) Instrumental Approach to the Law
Popular Sovereignty:
the main normative justification for the populist constitutional program
Populists desire to create a more direct relation between the People and the Constitutional complex of norms and values.
Expression of the will of a cohesive majority
Political power
To govern in the name of majority
Political government
The liberal understanding of parliamentary politics and representation is rejected
Populist goal: realizing a more intimate relation between political institutions and larger society.
Predominant approach of populists with Public Law
Tendency in populist constitutionalism
To collapse the distinction between ordinary and constitutional politics
Populist constitutional attitude
Result of populism's negative evaluation of liberal constitutionalism
Frequency of Constitutional interventions
Crisis of the Rule of Law: increasing of the arbitrary nature of the political regime
2010
1998
1988
Parliamentary election; Fidesz at 28.8%
Foundation of FIDESZ
Parlamentary elections; central-right coalition at 52%; ORBAN II
2002
1949-1989
2014
1990
Comunist period
Parliamentary election; Fidesz at 41%, but still lost
First free elections
Parlamentary elections. ORBAN III
1) Will of people as the only absolute power
2) Charismatic leader
3) People as a united community
4) No need for alternation between parties
5) Attack to the enemies of the people
2011: New “fundamental law”
2013: End of the process of emendation
Main points:
1) Only procedural review
2) No reference to constitutional and European case law
3) No “action popularis”
4) 2/3 majority for voting on legislation on media’s and information’s freedom
5) Definition of family
6) Criminalization of those who occupies public spaces
2005
2010
Parliamentary and presidential election; PiS at 27%
Plane accident; presidential elections lost by Jaroslaw Kaczyński
2001
2007
2015
Foundation of PiS ; parliamentary election with PiS at 9.5%
Parliamentary elections; PiS at 32.1% but lost; cohabitation
Parliamentary and presidential elections
1) Public security
2) Against homosexual unions and euthanasia
3) Economic intervention of the state
4) Against liberalization
1) QMV of 2/3 for every decision and presence of 13/15 judges for critical issues.
2) Managers of public radio and TV appointed by the executive.
3) Minister of justice and parliament appoint Judges of the Constitutional tribunal, of the NJC and the presidents of ordinary tribunals.
In 1972, a group of small extremist far-right parties converged into the new Front National, and Jean-Marie Le Pen became the leader of the party.
In 1984, the Front National obtained 10 seats in the European Parliament.
1980s: support of a common European defense and currency.
1990s: antagonization of pro-EU elite.
2000s: the EU as a totalitarian jail.
Financial crisis: worst recession after WWII.
Refugee crisis: migrants from Syria as "disease carriers" and a "criminal threat".
Brexit: the EU as a "prison of peoples" and justification for a Frexit referendum.
A constitutional program containing all the amendments that would give "greatness" back to the 1958 Constitution.
Goals:
Introduction of NEW PRINCIPLES
in the Constitution:
Art.1 of the Constitution: "France [...] shall ensure the equality of all citizens before the law, without distinction of origin, race or religion [...]"
Use the referendum to restore the superiority of national law and erase Title XV of the Constitution, which organizes the relations between France and EU institutions.
Art.55 of the Constitution:
"Treaties or agreements duly ratified or approved shall, upon publication, prevail over Acts of Parliament [...]"
President's mandate = Parliament's mandate = 5 years
This has weakened the President's role, therefore Le Pen proposes to go back to the 7-year term.
Paradox: cohabitation reduces the President's powers.
Reduce the number of MPs from 925 to 500.
Introduction of a 5% treshold in order to be represented in Parliament.
30% majority prime: it is a maximum limit, not a bonus.
The winning party would have to form a coalition in order to get a simple majority and pass laws.
This reform would establish a plebiscite relation between the President and the people, to the detriment of national representation and parliamentary debate.
Impose the referendum as the only possibility to amend the Constitution and extend its field of application to all areas of the law.
However, a referendum is not a constitutional debate.
Power to propose an amendment: President and Parliament.
The National Assembly and the Senate must approve the text in identical terms.
The text is then adopted either through a referendum or by 3/5 of the votes of the two Houses gathered in one Congress.
Le Pen wants to use the referendum to have her program passed.
Is it legally possible? Technically, yes.
VOTERS OF THE FN:
1st round of elections: Le Pen 21.7%
Macron 23.7%
2nd round of elections: Le Pen 33.9%
Macron 66.1%
UKIP BREXIT
RISE OF POPULISM IN UK
2019, BORIS JOHNSON
UKIP, 2015, FARAGE'S LEADERDSHIP
deal or NO deal?
2015, CAMERON, BREXIT REFERENDUM
29 March 2017, process of withdrawal (invoking Art, 50 TEU)
The vote to LEAVE THE EU, with NO INDICATION of its CONDITIONS, hit the parliamentary system
Having failed several times to get her agreement approved by Parliament, May resigned as prime minister (July 2019)
UK Independence Party (UKIP) led by Nigel Farage managed to combine Euroscepticism with populist nationalism.
He succeeded in representing the instances of the forgotten by politics, the white and elderly working class that feels oppressed by the political and foreign system in its own home, in the face of an increasingly multicultural society, the fear of an invasion of migrants, the European failure in the face of the Greek crisis and the more general crisis of the Euro and the political capacity of the European Union.
All democratic systems have within them protective mechanisms.
The UK lacks a ‘written’ constitution.
Under pressure, this could tend to constitutional implications.
MILLER/CHERRY (24 SEPTEMBER 2019)
because of "the effect of frustrating or preventing, without reasonable justification, the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions as a legislature and as the body responsible for the supervision of the executive"
The court has ruled that a Prime Minister cannot simply suspend the democratically elected Chamber of the National Parliament as and when they like. Certainly, the attacks on the independence of the Supreme Court’s latest prorogation decision matters to all Britons, as it is also an attack on everyone’s rights to political representation in a parliamentary democracy.
Populism takes hold where it successfully engages “the people” in a narrative that contests the rule of law ideal, an ideal which is premised on the notion of an independent judiciary deciding without fear or favor.
or military
experience
in or connections
with any major political party
The "forgotten American"
"The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer"
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution Article VI, Section 2
"This constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding".
Let’s consider one question relating to the rule of law raised by the Trump presidency:
Faithful execution of the laws and the Affordable Care Act
DJ. Trump, March 17, 2017: “I also want people to know that Obamacare is dead; it’s a dead health care plan. It’s not even a health care plan”.
The health care reform law is “gone”, “absolutely dead”, “finished”,“a dead carcass.”
What is it?
The individual mandate is the requirement that all U.S. residents either have health insurance or pay a penalty.
What changed?
The 2017 Republican tax legislation reduced the penalty for not having insurance to $0.
What does the administration say?
"We eliminated Obamacare's horrible, horrible, very expensive and very unfair, unpopular individual mandate. A total disaster. That was a big penalty. That was a big thing. Where you paid a lot of money for the privilege [...] of having no healthcare." — President Trump, The Villages, Florida, Oct. 3, 2019.
What is the impact?
1) ACA became unconstitutional.
2) The rising of insurance premiums.
Did Trump violate
the Constitution?
Take Care Clause, Article II, section 3: “The President shall […] take care that the Laws be faithfully executed […]”.
Vesting Clause, Article II, section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America […]”.
This provision means that the President has plenary executive power.
Does this include the power to exercise discretion in the application of the laws?
Is the Article II, Section 3 itself a limitation on presidential power or is it, rather, a provision which empowers the president with discretion in his application of the laws?
The term "democracy" is not mentioned by the Constitution; however, there have been numerous amendments to the Constitution to advance democracy.
For example:
Amendments XIV – Conferring citizenship on all persons born in the United States
Amendments XV – Right to vote for former slaves;
Amendments XVII – Direct election of United States Senators;
Amendments XIX – Women’s suffrage;
Amendments XXIII – Right to vote in presidential elections for citizens of Washington, D.C.;
Amendments XXIV – Banning the poll tax;
Amendments XXVI – Right to vote for citizens over eighteen years of age.
Amendment XV, Section I
"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude".
Trump said that "millions of illegal immigrants had voted in the 2016 United States presidential election, costing him the popular vote".
Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, also called the Voter Fraud Commission.
(From May 11, 2017 to January 3, 2018).
Is this Commission a pretext for vote suppression?
American Declaration of Independence
“We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness [...]”
Due Process Clause, Amendment V
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, [...] nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; [...]".
Equal Protection Clause, Amendment XIV, Section 1
"No State shall [...] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
President Joe Biden wrote recently that “American democracy is rooted in the belief that every man, woman and child has equal rights to freedom and dignity”.
Minority groups (like Hispanics, blacks, Muslims, immigrants, environmentalists, persons with disabilities, etc.) have all been subjected to discriminatory actions.
Example: MUSLIM BAN
LASTLY...
1. Populism criticizes liberal or legal constitutionalism, but its alternative constitutional solution is highly different from a democratic approach.
2. The claim of the populist is made on the basis of the mobilization of people against a common enemy, that undermines the common good
However, populism does little to nothing to address the complexity of constitutional democracy in the contemporary European context and, rather, paves the way for what could be called a democratic dictatorship.
VALERIA AGUS
MARIA RAFFAELLA FIORELLA
LIBERO PIO MECCARIELLO
NIKOLA MIRKOVIC
GIOVANNI VACCARONE
EDOARDO SORO