Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
On June 26, 1971, the case was heard.
The decision was 6-3 ruling on the side of The New York Times.
The major justification for the majority decision was that the United States did not have enough of a reason to issue prior restraint
The concurring justification was that The NY Times has the right to freedom of press.
The dissenting opinion argued that The NY Times didn’t think of national security or the possible repercussions of publishing the Pentagon Papers.
And on June 30, 1971 the case was decided.
The courts determined that prior restraint cannot be used unless there is sufficient proof of “grave and irreparable” danger to the United States.
According to this case, newspapers and Americans have the right to publish what they want as long as there is nothing detrimental to the United States or a matter of national security.
They saw no reason why the Pentagon Papers could be seen as espionage and they thought that it should have been public knowledge.
Richard Nixon
Edward Snowden published NSA surveillance information, which has caused the United States to charge him with espionage. Like Daniel Ellsberg he wanted the actions of the government to be revealed. The articles from Snowden were also published by The NY Times.