Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
n=115 x=81 p=.8
o
1
H :p=.8
H :p>.8 (claim,support,right-tailed)
Critical Value:invnorm(1-.05)= 1.65
1-PropZTest: z=-2.56 P-value=.9948
Level of Significance:.05
P-value>
Fail to Reject H
o
There is not enough evidence at 5% level of significance to support the claim that more than 80% of surveyed females will vote for Dean.
o
1
n=85 x=69 p=.8
H :p=.8
H :p>.8
Critical Value:invnorm(1-.05)=1.65
1-PropZTest: z=.27 P-value=.3931
Level of Significance: 05
P-value>
Fail to Reject H
1.65
-2.56
o
There is not enough evidence at 5% level of significance to support the claim that more than 80% of surveyed males will vote for Dean.
Data
.27
1.65
n=200 x=150 p=.8
o
1
H :p=.8
H :p>.8 (claim,support, right-tailed)
Critical Value: invnorm(1-.05)= 1.65
1-PropZTest: z=-1.77 P-value=.9615
Level of Significance: .05
P-value>
Fail to Reject H
o
There is not enough evidence at 5% level of significance to support the claim that more than 80% of surveyed people will vote for Dean.
-1.77
1.65
Conclusion
Two hundred people were asked to choose either Team Dean or Team Sam, who are both characters in the show Supernatural. First, I asked if they watch the show Supernatural to ensure that the results are valid. Then, I asked the question, "Are you team Dean or team Sam?"
I used the convenience sampling method by asking easy to reach people on social media.
Based on my research, there is not sufficient evidence at 5% level of significance to support the claim that more than 80% of surveyed people will vote for Dean.
I chose the convenience sampling method because it was hard to find people at school who watch the show. By using social media, I could pinpoint people who watch Supernatural and ask them my question.
My hypothesis was that more than 80% of the surveyed people would choose team Dean.
H :p=.8
o
H :p>.8
1
Improvements