Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
ACAMIS16 Tech Tools for Standards-Based Grading
Transcript of ACAMIS16 Tech Tools for Standards-Based Grading
Tech Tools and Practical Policies for Standards-Based Grading
(Pollio & Hochbein, 2015; Reys, Wasman, Reys, Lapan, & Holliday, 2003; Riordan & Noyce, 2001)
Principles & Assumptions
(Bloom, 1968; Marzano & Heflebower, 2011; O’Connor & O’Connor, 2009)
Gradecam and Speedgrader
Teacher judgment + evidence = good
Arithmetic mean & 100-point scale = bad
grades should not measure effort or organization.
Feedback and grades should support a conversation about a student's learning. Therefore, report performance on discrete standards.
"Update their scores" (reassessment)
80% * 80% = time for a summative
Less is more (for standards)
Most students can reach a high level of mastery
4321 to EPAN
Transcripts, GPA, etc.
Model Rubric (Proficiency Scale)
Grading policy: cutoffs, conversions, calculations
Barriers of culture/language
See Matt. See Matt grade. Grade, Matt, grade.
Make your own GradeCam quiz
Rubric + Standard grading in Canvas (demo only)
Evaluate SBG gradebook products using a checklist
Reflection: Musical Mingle
Compare your products. Which one do you like most, and why?
What potential do you in in standards-based grading?
What challenges do you see in standards-based grading?
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), n2.
Marzano, R. J., & Heflebower, T. (2011). Grades that show what students know. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 34–39.
O’Connor, K., & O’Connor, K. (2009). How to grade for learning, K-12 (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
Pollio, M., & Hochbein, C. (2015). The Association Between Standards-Based Grading and Standardized Test Scores as an Element of a High School Reform Model. Teachers College Record, 117(110302), 1–28.
Reys, R., Wasman, D., Reys, B., Lapan, R., & Holliday, G. (2003). Assessing the Impact of “Standards”-Based Middle Grades Mathematics Curriculum Materials on Student Achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 74–95.
Riordan, J. E., & Noyce, P. E. (2001). The Impact of Two Standards-Based Mathematics Curricula on Student Achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(4), 368–398.