Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
The Ethical Maze
1
The Ethical Maze
Key Issues
Emma Fowler-Ross
Who is the client?
Can't be objective
Education legislation
Power differential
Okay... but what's the big one?
References
the power differential
Government of New Brunswick, Department of Education. (2004). Policy for the protection of pupils. Retrieved from: www.gnb.ca/0000/pol/e/701a.pdf
Schultz, W., Sheppard, G., Lehr, R. & Shepard, B. (2006). Counselling ethics: Issues and cases. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association.
The Case
Applicable Guidelines
Respect for rights of clients - client has a right to date whomever she chooses; however in order to safeguard client, leaving the situation as is may be problematic.
A2
A4
If I choose to continue counselling Mr. White and/or Serena, supervision would be a necessary step in order to monitor my objectivity in the relationships.
I Chose Option 2 - Report
In order to respect integrity and promote welfare for clients, it would be of primary responsibility to make a decision with the consideration of both Mr. White and Serena.
B1
Give myself time to think and reflect
Tell Serena
Report to school principal
Be prepared for backlash from community
If I were to disclose information to the school, I would be breaching confidentiality of Serena, but not necessarily Mr. White. I would have no reason to disclose that I at one point counselled him.
B2
Main Facts
- Serena = student, 18, vulnerable.
- Mr. White = teacher, 30, widow.
- Counselled both Serena & Mr. White.
- Counsellor in the community.
A conflict of interest exists because I am aware of Mr. White's intentions while also being aware of Serena's history.
C7
Quick Check
Publicity =
Universality =
Justice =
Option 1 - Do Nothing
Ethical Principles
Nonmaleficence is not upheld as I am not preventing harm for Serena; however I am preventing harm for Mr. White.
Fidelity is not upheld with Serena; however it is with Mr. White.
Autonomy is upheld as both Serena and Mr. White are making their own decisions.
1. Nonmaleficence: "not willfully harming others and refraining from actions that risk harm to others"
2. Fidelity: "honouring client commitments and having integrity in client counsellor relationships"
3. Autonomy: "respecting clients' freedom of choice"
Who is my client?
+
-
B2
A4
B1
A2
C7
Option 2 - Report to School
Nonmaleficence is upheld for Serena and Mr. White.
Fidelity is not upheld.
Autonomy is not upheld.
-
+
A2
A4
B2
C7
B1
What would each option look like in a years time?