Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Purpose

The hypothesis that the refractive outcome of the first eye can be used to improve the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for the second eye

Design

Journal review

Use of Fellow Eye Data in the Calculation of Intraocular Lens Power for the Second Eye

Retrospective, consecutive case series

in a university clinic setting

Participant

Norman J. Tansuria

Harry J. Sumual

1235 patients who underwent sequential bilateral IOL implantation using the same type of IOL for both eyes.

In a subgroup of 232 eyes the actual postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured using the Lenstar LS900 laser biometer

(Haag-Streit AG,

Koeniz, Switzerland)

Methods

Main Outcome Measures:

The refractive outcome was analyzed in retrospect

and the IOL power calculation was reviewed

using 3 different methods:

(1) the old Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff (SRK) II formula,

(2) the newer SRK/T formula, and

(3) the more recent Olsen formula.

The error in diopters (D)

of the predicted refraction in the spectacle plane.

Results

The correlation coefficients between the prediction errors for the right and left eyes were

  • 0.56 SRK II
  • 0.38 SRK/T
  • 0.27 Olsen formula

respectively (P<0,001).

Based on the observed correlation, the prediction of the second eye could be corrected according to the regression formula:

SRK II

Conclusions

Specific Aspects of Related Science Field

Depending on the IOL power calculation formula, the prediction error of the first eye may be used to improved the prediction for the second eye

Substituting the measured postoperative ACD of the first eye for the estimated ACD for the second eye in the Olsen formula have a similar accuracy as the empirical regression formula

Using this formula,

the mean absolute error (MAE) decrease from 0.56 D to 0.46 D, 0.47 D to 0.41 D, 0.42 D to 0.40 D

with the SRK II (P<0.001),

the SRK/T (P<0.001) and

the Olsen formula (P<0.05)

Conclusions

The reason for this effect seems to be the formula-dependent inaccuracy in the prediction of the IOL position (ACD) after surgery

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi