Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

POWER: A RADICAL VIEW

Steven Lukes, 1975

He thought of...

THE ONE DIMENSIONal VIEW

THE three dimensional view

Pluralism

Liberal Ideology

critic of behaviorism of both dimensional views of power

power is not only exerted in actual conflicts

against II dv

-authority and manipulation shouldn't be exercised in power

¡LEADER SHAPE PREFERENCES!

based on actual conflicts, they exclude potential ones (1st and 2Nd dimensions)

I and II individualistics views

take potential issues out of politics

potential issue = latent conflict,

controversy between

interests of people exercising power

and people excluded

behaviour

exposed by

political participation

-decision: concious choice

-bias can change our choice purpose

subjective

pluralists, power in conflict cases.

observable, actual

A´s capacity to govern society

reformists: non decision making just for denied entry to grievances in form of issues.

Power as 'individuals realizing their wills' Max Weber

-1 phenomenon: collective action not attributed individually

Potential and actual power

-2 phenomenon: ilization of bias as a form of the organization.

IIIDV:

-grievance: indirect complain which involve feelings as deprivation or unease

-power not to prevent, but for shape preferences

-->accept role--> no alternative

Attempt of a manipulate consensus

conflict of interests

Elite prevails in decision-making

through

elite´s, policy preferences

analogize this theory with radical ideology;

Lukes prefer III rather than I and II DV

the two dimensional view

Reformist ideology

Criticizes One dimensional view

ANTI-BEHAVIOURAL

Focus

of power

(Two faces)

ELITE GROUP

(interest satisfied at the expense of others)

It is possible to influence decisions by

SHAPING THE AGENDA

inactivity

potential issues (prevented by)

concrete decisions

actual issues

Presentation made by the students:

A'S GOT SUCCESSFUL CONTROL OVER B

non-decision

making

decision

making

POWER

MANIPULATION

AUTHORITY

INFLUENCE

force

irene sanchez

alba gurpegui

irene olombrada

power

coercion

Securing of compliance through the threat of sanctions

Wednesday 16/09/15

Introduction to Politics

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi