Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Mimesis is imitation of reality: imagine that you are watching an interaction in front of you. You have no insight into the thoughts, motives, or intentions of others. It is the showing of the story through action.
Diegesis goes beyond reality: by utilizing the all-knowing narrator, you have insights into the thoughts, feelings, and intentions of others. It is the telling of a story by an omniscient narrator.
In mimesis, the
author shows through
action alone. (i.e. She said, 'Let's get mortal, lads! Innit!')
It is visual, vocal.
Most narratives we found
were diegetic. (e.g: She
came from Geordie Shore.)
It is sensual, internal.
We understand that they are opposites.
To understand we must first make the distinction between diegesis & mimesis. Then we can see how they can both
be used.
(Halliwell)
Understanding these theories leads to greater awareness of how we as writers use narration. Mimesis and diegesis can be regulated and directed to make the reader ask more questions - increasing suspense, drama and ambiguity in our writing.
Being too aware may stifle a writer's creativity when writing a piece, as they may become too concerned with whether they are over-using mimesis or diegesis.
We, personally, thought that it opened our eyes to the complexity of writing. It also made us consider the books that we've read in the past and how much mimetic or diegetic narrative is used.
Rose Mary Petrass
& Tennessee Lang