Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Solar cells
Panel
Modules
Tower
THE QUESTION IS: IS IT FEASIBLE TO CONSTRUCT SUCH KIND OF RENEWABLE SOURCES OF ELECTRICITY IN THE TOKYO BAY AREA?
Taking all these factors into account, studies show that solar energy is still byfar, the cleaner, more environmentally-friendly choice over non-renewable energy resources like gas, coal and oil.
In terms of costing, the future evolution of costs for generation of electricity from solar energy will depend on continued technological progress and breakthroughs. It will also depend on the potential for policies to create greater penetration and to accelerate the scale of production—largely an issue of long-term policy stability and policy clarity.
America's Energy Future Panel on Electricity from Renewable Resources, and National Research Council,
2010, Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments: The National Academies Press.
Bernardi, M., et. al, 2012, Solar energy generation in three dimensions, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6880.
Perez, R. and M. Perez, (2009a): A fundamental look at energy reserves for the planet. The
IEA SHC Solar Update, Volume 50, pp. 23, April 2009.
REN 21, Renewables 2010 Global Status Report, 19 (2010).
Internet Sources
1 panel =
* non-polluting;
* has no moving parts that could break down;
* requires little maintenance and no supervision;
* life of 20-30 years with low running costs
1 min =can supply one day for the
world's energy (Solar
energy = 0.044 TW/min)
1 day = provides more energy than
our current population
would consume in 3.9 years
*There is no need to pay for fishery rights since the selected area is not covered by the this.
C(¥ cost) = ¥ 11,539,066,357.5 / [4,790 016 kWh (35)]
= ¥ 68.83 /kWh
The life span of the structure can last up to 35 years so the total cost will be:
Ct = C + [(C)5%)35]
= ¥ 4,196,024,130 + [(0.05)(¥4,196,024,130)(35)]
= ¥11,539,066,357.5
(1)Area of the H-shape beam: S1 = 0.1 * 0.001 * 2 + (0.23 – 2 * 0.01) * 0.01 = 0.0041 m2
Length of all the H-shape beams:
L1 = 40 * 1.6 m + 20 * 3.954= 143.08 m
(40 for connecting the modules to the columns and 20 for connecting each 2 modules)
V1 = S1 * L1 = 0.0041 m2 * 143.08 m = 0.586628 cubic meter
(2)Area for the H-shape column: S2 = 0.4 * 0.021 * 2 + (0.4 – 2 * 0.021) * 0.021 = 0.024318 Sq. m
Length of all the H-shape columns:
L2 = 2 * 40.5m =81 m (2 columns for 40.5 m tall each)
V2 = S2 * L2 = 0.024318 m2 * 81 m = 1.969758 cubic meter
(3)The total volume of the steel structure will be
V = V1 + V2 = 0.586628 m3 + 1.969758m3 = 2.556386 cubic meter
(4)The mass of the steel structure will be
m = * V = 7860 kg/m3 * 2.556386m3 = 20093.19396kg =22.149
(5)the cost of steel structure per tower
C1 = 200,000 yen/t * 21.813 t = 4,362,600 yen (including the labor cost)
100 m apart
E. OPEX (Running Cost/ Operational Expenses)
C = C1 (100) + C2 (100) + C3
C = [(100)(¥ 4,362,600)]+ [(100)(¥37,590,220.8)] +
¥ 742,050
= ¥ 4,196,024,130
D. CAPEX (Initial Cost of the Whole System)
G. Average cost of electricity (¥/kWh)
F. Total Cost of the Whole System
A. Cost of steel structure/tower
5%/year of the initial cost
= ¥4,196,024,130*.05
= ¥ 209, 801, 206.5
Whole system
One tower will be composed of 240 panels
Max Power Output per tower:
3.96 kW / panel x 240 panels = 950.4 kW
source: Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6680
For the type of IEC 60228, it will be $ 0~999 /km average $ 500 /km ~ ¥ 41,225/km
*the distance of cables connecting each other:
100 m * 100 = 10,000 m = 10 km
*the distance from the centre of the solar tower field to the
nearest land in Chiba: 8 km
So the total length of the cables will be 10 km + 8 km = 18 km
The total cost of the cables will be:
C3 = ¥ 41,225 /km * 18 km = ¥ 742,050
PV system cost: $4.70per watt in Japan (source: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews), hence:
$4.70/w = ¥ 329.6/w
So the cost of the PV sytem (inc. inverter etc.) per tower will be:
¥ 329.6/w * 95,040 w = ¥ 31,325,184
Including labor cost for the assembly:
C2 = ¥ 31,325,184 * 120% = ¥ 37,590,220.8
C. Cost of submarine power cables
B. Cost of solar panels/tower
Made up of 3DPV Solar Si cells
- High Efficiency (25.47% compared to usual
efficiency ranges of 15% to 19%
- Low manufacturing process
- Thin absorbing regions
- Below surface contacts
- Wide angle collection
Emission intensity of Tokyo Electric Power Company is 0.463.
Hence, if the system will produce 4,790,016 kWh/year × 0.463,
then using the system as the source of electricity will save/reduce 2,217,777.41 t-CO2/year
Transportation
Steel: 21.813t + panel 3.6 t
= 25.413 t×100×8 km×39(Emission Intensity) ×1/1000000
=0.7928856 t-CO2
Carbon Dioxide Reduction Calculation
Carbon Dioxide Emission Calculation
2
Area of one panel: 1.32 m
Power output: 3.96kW (20x the
conventional solar panel
which usually produces
0.198 kwh)
2
One module : 6 panels
Area : 7.94m
Power Output : 23.76 kwh