Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
The teacher presents students with a topic to investigate and provides a guiding question for them to answer. The teacher also leads a "Tool Talk".
Each group is responsible for developing a method to collect data. Each group then carries out their plan and collects the data they need.
The argument includes a claim (which is an answer to the guiding question), evidence, and a justification of the evidence. Each group creates their argument on a whiteboard large enough so that it can be shown to other groups.
Each group shares their argument while the audience asks questions and offers critiques. After the session, each group is given an opportunity to revise their initial argument.
Groups are encouraged to collect additional data if a flaw in a method was identified or an idea that needs to be tested was mentioned during the argumentation session.
The teacher and the students discuss the content, ways to improve the design of an investigation, relevant crosscutting concepts, and concepts related to the nature of science or the nature of scientific inquiry.
Each student writes a report to share what they learned during the investigation The report includes three sections:
Each group uses a peer-review guide to evaluate the quality of three different investigation reports. Groups are required to give the author feedback.
The original report is revised based on the results of the peer-review process and submitted to the teacher for a final evaluation.