Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
What part, if any, does law play in the reproduction of the structural inequalities which characterize capitalist societies?
While Marx's critiques are not infallible, there is some legitimacy in his critiques about the gaps in an orthodox jurisprudence that should not be discounted.
Elimination of elections will unify the public by removing the influence of the dominant class in politics that causes social inequality.
Pros: The creation of law would encompass the needs of the population as whole when implemented by an unbiased unchanging agency.
Cons: This is otherwise known as a dictatorship. Human rights would not increase.
Law should be uniformed among all states free of completion among agencies.
Pros: The elimination of state rights would allow for increased national connectivity and uniformity. Without checks and balance justice can prevail uninhibited with interference from state to national government and vice versas.
Cons: Without a check and balance justice is not likely to prevail but become too powerful. Violations of human right ensue.
Laws major purpose is to protect property produces capital.
Pros: Corporate accountability.
Cons: The elimination of competition infringes on a citizens freedom by reducing their chooses.
The formulation and implementation of law are strictly in the hands of government that is often swayed by the dominant class.
Pros: Laws geared toward the betterment of the whole population.
Cons: Someone is always left out.
Law justifies and perpetuates the needs of the dominant class.
Pros: For those in the dominate class ensures their interests are addressed.
Cons: Creates a second class population
Law perpetuates the values of the dominant class.
Pros: If laws were to be geared toward culturally unbiased ideals then everyone would benefit.
Cons: Elimination of diversity.