Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Critique of Pure Reason
11
"How can we know about the limits of our knowledge?"
"pure reason"
The reason why he start to work is whether Metaphysics is possible or impossible.
Q1. How is pure mathematics possible?
Q2. How is pure sciences possible?
"a priori"
Therefore, Kant thinks that pure mathematics and pure natural sciences was built
independently from the experience and walked in the way of safety the study.
“Is it possible metaphysics as the study?”
"transcendental philosophy"
"transcendental critique"
“something to be approached through a preparatory science, in which we merely examine reason, its sources and its limits.(B25)”.
“How much can our reason know about knowledge?”
Critique of Pure Reason
이윤영 권민지 최유리
source
<Critique of Pure Reason >
이상헌 , 「수학적 구성과 선험적 종합판단」, 『칸트연구』제18집, 2006
윤병태, 「『순수이성비판』의 근본이념과 선험적 종합판단 - 초판과 재판의 머리말을 중심으로 - 」, 『인문과학』제 75집, 1996
Conclusion
How is it possible a priori synthesis judgment?
The general problem of
'pure reason'
For answering this question, Kant starts work to make the boundaries,
limitations of the 'pure reason' which is the principle of our knowledge.
(…)a court of justice, by which reason may secure its rightful claims while dismissing all its groundless pretensions,(…)(AXII)