Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Napoleon: Hero or Villain
30
PROS:
Conclusion:
-Life was better when with napoleon compared to Louis the XVI.
-Napoleon made peace between the state and the church.
-Tried to protect the economy by placing high tariffs on imported goods.
-Initiated program that employed many.
-Filled museums with art.
-Napoleon wanted legitamacy and democracy in France
Although we may see Napoleon as a tyrant, being worst than any other leader of France, we must acknowledge the fact that he benefited France in the long run. In terms of economy, territory, and military, he had kept his promises by improving it in the country, unlike past rulers. Even though people had seen him as a tyrant, we must say that his actions had justified his past mistakes, because he had done a greater good to the country than wrong to the people.
Introduction:
Napoleon was a relief for the people of France, as he had aspired for a non-corrupt, democratic government. He used propaganda and provided better lives to the people to popularize himself. However, he was also said to be a tyrant and the worst leader of all time. So the real question is: does one wrong denounce a thousand rights?
Napoleon:
Hero or Villain
Fides Arguelles, Sam Enns, Jay Makalintal
Socials 9 Block F
Ms. Shepherd
April 30,2015
CONS:
-the economy itself suffered at the time
-people took no part in representing the
government in terms of representation
-Napoleon always got things his way
-is said to be worse dictator than previous
rulers (not stated as to why)