Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
The class positions of the schema are likely to influence an individual's economic security
Marxist's would be interested in the schema because it differentiates between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie
In summary, Goldthorpe's Class Schema is too broad for today's society
1. Could help nurses to understand how different children’s backgrounds could be
Functionalists would be interested because they believe everyone in society has a function and this schema highlights how each occupation makes up society
Nurses should not allow the schema to affect the care they give as they should not let prejudices cloud their judgement
2. In relation to childhood, it could help to understand how they have been brought up
In society, individuals could be labelled in relation to their position
3. Allows nurses to understand the children's behaviours
The occupations in society are now different in determining social class compared to when Goldthorpe created the schema
Nurses shouldn’t allow this scheme to change the way they treat patients of their families.
Bergman, M. M. and Joye, D. 2005. Comparing Social Stratification Schema: CAMSIS, CSP-CH, Goldthorpe, ISCO-88, Trelman and Wright. Cambridge: SSRG Publications.
Nurses wouldn't be able to allow their personal prejudices to make an assumption.
Breen, R. and Rottman, D.B. 2013, Class Stratification: Comparative Perspective [online]. New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. and Griffiths, S., 2006. Sociology [online]. Fifth edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goldthorpe, J. and Mcknight, A., 2004. The Economic Basis of Social Class [online]. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.
Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Roux, B., Friedman, S. and Miles, A., 2013. A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment. SAGE Journals [online], 47 (2219-950).