The revision of the ESCO information sources
Towards the ESCO Guidelines v2
by Vito Spinelli
We are asking too much to ESCOpedia
Issues with our ESCOpedia approach:
- Technical information not fit for broader audience
- Magnitude of information not fit for wiki-style
- Redundancy issue: split process from components
- Continuous update has lower priority
- Information for the TEG is too dispersed
Manual for the TEG
Information access point for ESCO stakeholders
Flexibility towards evolving methodology
Dissemination to broader audience
caffeinating, calculating, computerating by Ryan Ritchie, on Flickr. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/
- Review of the current approach
- Current challenges
- Planning the way forward
ESCO Guidelines
ESCOpedia
Planning
ESCO Guidelines
Project information source
Split ESCO components and development process
Collect and update available knowledge
Revise document structure
Add missing/new content
- Wider audience
- Policy-makers
- Civil servants (ministries, PES, edu&training inst.)
- Stakeholders
- Online community
- ESCO content developers (TEG and CSREF)
- Application developers and service providers
- ESCO management bodies
- European Commission DGs
ESCOpedia
Revise and update existing articles
Check for missing information