Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Enforcement of Human rights

open condemnation arising from public scrutiny, condemnation, findings of violation

Utility of shame?

States clearly lobby to avoid ‘shame’

Galvanise opposition

Lend credibility to opposition

Can have long-term corrosive effects

Can deprive countries of friends and influence

Can prompt stronger unilateral or multilateral sanctions

Problems with shame

- slow to have on-the-ground effect

- not a level playing field

- can generate nationalistic backlash

- has the least effect on the most incorrigible governments

Security Council may authorise sanctions, including the use of force, against a State if it deems that that State is threatening “international peace and security”

Iraq (1991)

Somalia (1992)

Haiti (1994)

Libya (2011)

DISTINGUISH CH VI PEACEKEEPING

Problems with Security Council

Veto of the Permanent 5

Need 9 affirmative votes

No standing army so few resources

Responsibility to protect?

ICISS report

World Summit Outcome 2005

Numerous mentions in UN docs since

Levels of responsibility

DISTINGUISH PEACEKEEPING, CONSENT

Bangladesh 1970 (India)

Uganda 1979 (Tanzania)

Kampuchea/Cambodia 1979 (Vietnam)

Kosovo 1999 (NATO)

Iraq? 2003 (Coalition of the Willing)

Article 2(4): All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations

focus on Article 2(4)

responsibility to protect?

So long as certain conditions apply

Scale of abuse must be extreme

Motive

Last resort

Force used must be proportionate

Must be “good” humanitarian outcome

A good idea?

A GOOD IDEA?

Strength of target state/imposing state

Effect on elite and effect on oppressed

Wishes of oppressed may be relevant (eg ANC)

Can take a very long time

‘Smart’ sanctions

Can lead to isolation of target government, loss of influence of sanctioning government

Economic sanctions

Diplomatic Sanctions

Sporting Sanctions

Individual criminal responsibility

The mobilisation of shame

Sarah Joseph

use of force

other sanctions

chapter vii

un cHARTER

Exception: Article 51 self defence

IRAN

GAZA

BURMA

IRAQ

ISRAEL

Sth Africa

SERBIA

unilateral humanitarian intervention

It is legal

it is illegal

orthodox position

Examples

rwanda

DRC

CAR

syria

mexico

SUDAN

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi