Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
The Treaty is regarded as an international instrument as it was signed by two states; the iwi of New Zealand and the British crown. Upon signing, New Zealand became one state.
Some believe it doesn't alter NZ's legal landscape; "merely an aspiration"
Toki (2010) argues "complements and assists Maori judicial and political action, adding another layer to the existing indigenous rights regime"
The Declaration is "an affirmation of the Treaty principles and assists in the analysis of the relationship between indigenous peoples and state governments".
Case law illustrates that courts not prepared to ignore international obligations
Superior
law?
Article 26 states that "indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop or control lands and territories that they traditionally occupied or used"
Articles 19, 28, 32
Principles vs.
specific rights
A Treaty of Waitangi/
Declaration Court?
Ordinary Law?