Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Harold Bloom notes that Lear must be seen as "paradigm for greatness…at once father, king and a kind of mortal god", to understand his disempowerment under Goneril and Regan. At their hands, his age changes from a source of wisdom to weakness, changing from a king to merely "a poor old man/As full of grief as age, wretched in both." His authority disappears, and while he curses passionately "-I will do such things-/ What they are, yet I know not; but they shall be/The terrors of the earth", he has no power to realize these.
The sisters cutting his retinue of knights from a hundred to fifty to finally none, mirror the shearing away of his hopes of their piety and love, as well as of his own identity as king. His only remaining dignity is the "noble anger" where he resists tears and their connotations of womanliness and weakness, pledging that "this heart shall break into a hundred thousand flaws/Or ere I’ll weep", which emphasies greatness, even in his current feeble state.
The inclusion of Gloucester’s tragedy to parallel Lear’s enhances the play's complexity, and critics have discussed the links between the two greatly.
Where suffering is concerned, what is most dramatically significant might be their language of expression. To Mark Van Doren, Gloucester’s suffering is plain and conventional, where Lear’s, given the privilege of madness, is poetical and lyrical. Juxtaposing their responses to their plight makes this clear, where Gloucester can only say "Alack, alack the day!", Lear states majestically how "When we are born, we cry that we are come/To this great stage of fools".
Van Doren sums up: "Each music serves the other-Gloucester’s to measure the height of Lear’s, and Lear’s to pour meaning into the lowly goodness and modesty of Gloucester’s."
Thank you for watching
'King Lear' is acknowledged to be one of the great tragedies in literature and the finest of Shakespeare's tragedies. To go into it deeply is a stimulating and exciting intellectual experience, and a closer acquaintance with the play opens up insights not just into the life the life and times of Shakespeare but, because of the play's universality (applies to every time period, climate & nation), into everyday life here and now. We have various themes interspersed throughout the play, including rash decisions, blind stubbornness, sincerity, hypocrisy, flattery, filial devotion (loyalty), betrayal and treachery, unconditional and disinterested (Cordelia) love and devotion. All these themes fit in the world of today as they did in Shakespeare's times and that is why the play has a great universal significance
Lear still hopes, even in Cordelia’s defeat, for a happy ending with her: "so we’ll live/And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh/At gilded butterflies." Poignant and loving as this is, the next instant Lear holds Cordelia dead in her arms is rightly recognised as one of the most well-known and emotionally powerful scenes in Shakespeare.
Lear’s initial distress, the extinguishing of the vain hope that Cordelia still lives, and Lear’s final words, where he utters bleak line: "never, never, never, never, never", is the culmination of suffering in the play. It ends, as it must, in Lear’s death.
Lear is portrayed as one whose suffering far outstrips the magnitude of his original error. Central to the idea of suffering is the idea of its futile and nihilistic nature, with no cause for optimism and hope, especially with Cordelia’s death. Bloom states that "Suffering achieves its full reality of representation in King Lear, hope receives none", and Lear's pathos allows us no choice but to suffer along with him.
Harold Bloom referred to this point as the "poetic centre" the play. In Edgar's words, the scene is "matter and impertinency mixed-Reason in madness!", and Lear blends the crazed babbling of a madman with words that show an increased perception of his reality. The following observations are points worthy of further examination:
- Perception of Vulnerability: Lear has finally recognized the falseness of his previous illusion of love by his two elder daughters: ‘They told me I was everything, "tis a lie, I am not ague-proof". His knowledge of self-identity of himself is confronted, but not solved; and he remains powerless against his fallibility.
- Reactions towards Woman: Lear has generalized the wickedness of his two daughters as the wickedness of women: "But to the girdle do the gods inherit;/Beneath is all the fiend’s" is part of an expressive and poetical tirade against women. The roles of women in King Lear are a source of heated discussion.
- Loss of Authority: Lear has lost the faith in a system of justice and retribution: "Plate sin with gold, /And the strong lance of justice hurtles breaks". The loss of the himself, as the king and head of a state is paralleled with the absence of a greater sense of divine order, or nihilism, within the play.
- Anger: Lear has expressed disappointment and anger vividly in previous scenes. However by now, his anger has overcome his language, a mere spondee where he repeats the word kill: "And when I have stol’n upon these son-in-laws,/Then kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill!"
How emotions are conveyed through language is important when looking at suffering in King Lear. At this point in time, Lear might have come to new realizations, but he is still tortured and wracked in suffering. The only possible comfort he could find, from Cordelia in the next scene is transient, and the play rapidly moves towards its conclusion.
Gloucester speaks these words as he wanders on the heath after being blinded by Cornwall and Regan (4.1.37–38). They reflect the profound despair that grips him and drives him to desire his own death. More important, they emphasize one of the play’s chief themes—namely, the question of whether there is justice in the universe. Gloucester’s philosophical musing here offers an outlook of stark despair: he suggests that there is no order—or at least no good order—in the universe, and that man is incapable of imposing his own moral ideas upon the harsh and inflexible laws of the world. Instead of divine justice, there is only the “sport” of vicious, inscrutable gods, who reward cruelty and delight in suffering. In many ways, the events of the play bear out Gloucester’s understanding of the world, as the good die along with the wicked, and no reason is offered for the unbearable suffering that permeates the play.