Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Explanation of Cases:

Case 3

What does section 1, 2(b), 24 state?

Explanation of Cases:

Case 2

  • Keegstra was a public school teacher
  • willfully promoted hatred against Jews

Regina. v. Butler

Decision

  • Donald Victor Butler

The accused was tried and convicted

  • Butler handled pornographic videos, magazines and objects

Decision of the Court

  • rights and freedoms only to reasonable limits

The court upheld the obscenity law as a justifiable restriction on freedom of expression

How does this section of the Charter work?

Leading Supreme Court of Canada Cases

Explanation of Cases:

Case 1

LaVigne v. Ontario Public Service Employees

  • Guarantees freedom
  • Freedom of though, belief and expression
  • Etc..

  • Francis LaVigne was a teacher.

  • LaVigne complained the OPSEU misused his dues.

  • Union law states that they can use dues for the advancements of the common interests of the group.

  • Violated section 2b of his right

R.v. Butler

R.v. James Keegstra

freedom of:

  • thought
  • belief
  • opinion
  • expression
  • including freedom of the press and other media of communication

Decision of The Court

The court unanimously said that the charter did apply but also stated that there was no violation of section 2b towards LaVigne.

  • enforcement
  • exclusion of evidence

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Section 2(b)

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi