Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Before 1997, Asia attracted almost half of the total capital inflow into developing countries
High interest rates attractive to foreign investors
Asian economic miracle : 8% –12% GDP in the late 1980s and early 1990s
Dramatic run-up in asset prices - A bubble fueled by "hot money"
Early 1990s, U.S. economy recovered from a recession
Fed raised U.S. interest rates to head off inflation
This made the U.S. a more attractive investment destination relative to Southeast Asia
Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea had large private current account deficits
Excessive exposure to foreign exchange risk in both the financial and corporate sectors
Domino effect started from Malaysia
Why did it happen ?
Mohit Agarwal
Prateek Batra
Sanjeev Marwah
Anupam Mukherjee
Yogesh Sharma
Anshul Verdia
N. Sandeep
Bharath H.
1. Domestic banks seeking foreign funds from the West to finance the lending. Motivated by profit
2. Took advantage of fixed exchange rates in order to reduce the cost of this borrowing.
3.Short-term nature of the foreign debts - need for the bank’s accounts always to be liquid.
4. Existing loans collateralised with stock/property assets were already failing.
5. Banks financed (sometimes with official guidance) corporate investments, focused on increasing market share. Inadequate attention to the returns generated
1. Absence of an adequate regulatory framework for businesses, especially the banks - Chaebol
2. Crony capitalism
3. Politically influenced lending encouraged the channelization of international borrowing to corporations
1985 - Plaza Accord - Yen moves from 240 to 120 against dollar
1989-90 - Japanese markets peak
1994 - Mexican crisis
1995 - Japanese yen peaks to 80
1996 - Japan introduces VAT, first signs of bank failure
1997 - Baht crisis, Indonesia, South Korea
1998 - Yen drops to 137, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Russia, Brazil, LCTM
1999 - Recovery in South Korea followed by others
IMF stepped in to initiate a $40 billion program to stabilize the currencies of South Korea, Thailand, and Indonesia
Structural Adjustment Package (SAP)
Crisis-struck nations to reduce government spending and deficits
Allow insolvent banks and financial institutions to fail
Aggressively raise interest rates
The reasoning was that these steps would restore confidence in the nations’ fiscal solvency, penalize insolvent companies and protect currency values.
To attain the chain objectives of tightened money supply,
Discouraged currency speculation
Stabilized exchange rate
Curbed currency depreciation
Contained inflation
KLSE composite index lost more than 50% and came down to below 600 levels from 1200
Ringgit fell from over 2.50 per dollar to 4.57 per dollar
Overnight rate rose from 8% to 40%
Ratings fell several notches from investment grade to junk status
Measures taken by Mahathir Mohammad
Introduced the peg at 3.80 ringgit per dollar(by Bank Negara)
Stopping overseas trading of ringgit and other ringgit assets
Foreign portfolio funds with a minimum one year “stay period”
Largely controlled by developed nations
"New Colonialism” austerity measures inhibit long term economic growth
Western style economic reforms and greater ownership by foreign firms
Monetarist priorities overlook public health, environment, and poverty
Repayment policies do not foster long-term growth
Current account deficit to GDP ratio was 5%
Very popular investment destination
Kuala Lumpur Stock exchange most active stock exchange
KLSE composite index at over 1200
Ringgit trading at over 2.50 per dollar
Overnight rate was at 7%
Despite Strong fundamentals of Indonesia