Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
What is...
Lazarus and Folkman (1982)
coping strategies considered
relevance and meaning
Classic Study: Ekman and Freisen (1971)
Back / Side
- Sit in Pairs; Sit in Groups
- "Growth and Opportunity"
- Toothpaste Illustration
- 'Instructional Calendar and Materials' Group in GC
- Reminder About Study of Stress / Transactional Model
- Emotion: Biology and Cognition Together
- Assignment in GC
- Key Theorist: Paul Eckman
- KR: Schachter and Singer (1962)
Back / Side
- KR: Anderson & Pichert (1978)
- Assignment in GC
- Concept Map & Brainstorm - Impacts of Memory
- KR: Loftus & Pickrell (1995)
Back / Side
Phones, bags along side or back...
- Post Question as CLASS COMMENT
- Notes... Questions... Discussion
- 'Multi-Modal' Model Reviewed
- 'Working Memory' Model Expanded
- KR: Baddelley and Hitch (1974)
- Present Your Part of Working-Memory Model
- Explain Anderson & Pichert (1978)
- Remember Loftus & Palmer (1974)
- Rosen & Colleagues (2013) (Induced Media Multi-tasking)
Introduction and Exploration of I.A. Report by Friday
Essay Two - Wed./Thur., 12/12-13/18
Language and Schema
https://www.ted.com/talks/keith_chen_could_your_language_affect_your_ability_to_save_money
(Craik & Lockhart (1972))
Working memory capacity improves with age AND Individual WM capacity varies widely in same age
Basic Principles
Examples:
Cognitive neuroscientists study the biological basis for cognitive processing
Classic experiment demonstrating mis-information effect
Facilitated by perception, memory, and SCHEMA
Phones, bags along side or back...
- Demonstration - Eyewitness Memory
- Key Study: Loftus & Pickrell (1995)
- Research... Take a Side... Argue/Discuss
- Pair... Group
Essay Two - Wed./Thur., 12/12-13/18
- Different types/stores
- Participants come to lab in pairs (older & younger)
- In experimental context, participants were twice interviewed regarding reports of events from past
- One (of four) stories was false story about being lost in a mall
- 25% of Participants 'recalled' the false memory during both interviews (measured by 'clarity' and 'confidence' scales)
"Tom W. is of high intelligence, although lacking in true creativity. He has a need for order and clarity, and for neat and tidy systems in which every detail finds its appropriate place. His writing is rather dull and mechanical, occasionally enlivened by somewhat corny puns and by flashes of imagination of the sci-fi type. He has a strong drive for competence. He seems to feel little sympathy for other people and does not enjoy interacting with others. Self-centered, he nonetheless has a deep moral sense."
“Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with the issue of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in antinuclear demonstrations.
(from Tversky & Kahneman (1974))
Criticism: Research lacks
(from Kahneman "Thinking: Fast and Slow")
Which of the following do you prefer?
Imagine that the U.S. is preparing for the outbreak o an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. Assume that the exact scientific estimates of the consequences of the programs are as follows:
A. 50% chance to win $1,000, 50% to win nothing
B. Win $450 for sure
Choose between...
A. $2,500 with probability 33%, $2,400 with probability 66%, $0 with probability 1%
- If Program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved.
- If Program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved.
B. $2,400 with certainty
Which of the following do you prefer?
Which of the two programs do you prefer?
A. 20% chance to win $1,000
B. Lose $200 for sure
Back / Side
- Linked with Target CA1
- KR: Brown and Kulik (1977)
- Assignment in GC
- Research... Collaborate... Argue
SAQ - Cognitive Approach (Targets CA1, CA2), Fri., 1/31/20
* 'Expected Utility Theory' predicts people base prospects of gains/losses same... based on current wealth
* Kahneman & Tversky (1979, 1981) and others show this isn't reality
On a scale from 1 to 10, rate the vividness
On a scale from 1 to 10, rate your confidence
Label as personal or newsworthy
(Fishbein & Ajzen)
Brown and Kulik (1977)
* In Summary:
1) people appear more 'loss averse' than 'gain seeking'
2) people are usually irrational when making economic decisions
Back / Side
Back / Side
- A Few Scenarios...
- KR: Kahneman & Tversky (1974)
- Assignment in GC
- KR: Daniel Kahneman
SAQ - Cognitive Approach (Targets CA1, CA2), Fri., 1/31/20
- Assignment in GC
- Biases: Framing OR Cognitive Dissonance
SAQ - Cognitive Approach (Targets CA3, CA5, CA6), Fri., 2/7/20?
Essay Three (Targets CA1, CA2, CA4, CA6), Mon/Tue., 2/10-11/20