Purposes
-Diagnosis and Treatment planing
-Describing and documenting a patient’s occlusion and communications.
-Allow the prevalence of a malocclusion within a population to be recorded,
-Aid in the assessment of need, difficulty, and success of orthodontic treatment
Malocclusion Classification
Quantitative
ََََQualitative
Normal Occlusion
Two different approaches :
- Feature of a malocclusion is given a score and the summed total is then recorded (e.g. the PAR Index).
Descriptive:
- The worst feature of a malocclusion is recorded (e.g. the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need)
e.g. - Angle in 1899, The British Standards Institute BSI (1983
Drawback:
Continuous variable so that no clear cut-off points
Does not provide any indication of the difficulty of treatment.
The occlusion when upper and lower molars are in relationship such that the mesiobuccal cusp of upper molar occluded with mesiobuccal groove of lower molar and teeth are all arranged in a smoothly curving line, Angle (1899) .
Houston et al, (1992) defined normal occlusion as an occlusion within accepted definition of the ideal and which caused no functional or aesthetic problems.
Commonly used classifications and indices
Summers occlusal index
Angle’s classification
The first permanent molars erupted into a constant position within the facial skeleton.
Assess the anteroposterior relationship of the arches.
Loss of the first permanent molars
Particularly for research purposes.
The success of treatment.
The index scores nine defined parameters including :
Objectives
molar relationship, overbite, overjet, posterior crossbite, posterior open bite, tooth displacement, midline relation, maxillary median diastema, and absent upper incisors.
British Standards Institute classification
Drawbacks:
This is based upon incisor relationship
The most widely used descriptive classification.
as with any descriptive analysis it is difficult to classify borderline cases.
Classification of Malocclusion
by Sami Alshahrani
Introduction
Definitions
Need of Classification
Different Classification Systems
Andrews’ six keys
Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)
Thanks
Determine the likely impact of a malocclusion on an individual’s dental health and psychosocial well-being.
It comprises two elements:
References:
2.Aesthetic component
1.Dental health component
A set of ten standard photographs, which are also graded
from score 1, the most aesthetically pleasing,
to score 10, the least aesthetically pleasing.
The scores are categorized according to need for treatment as follows:
The single worst feature of a malocclusion is noted and categorized reflecting need for treatment
*dental health component Alone is more Widely used.
An Introduction to Orthodontics 4th Edition by Laura Mitchell.
Hassan R, Rahimah AK. Occlusion, malocclusion and method of measurements-an overview. Archives of orofacial sciences. 2007;2:3-9.
score 1 or 2 — none
score 3 or 4 — slight
score 5, 6, or 7 — moderate/borderline
score 8, 9, or 10 — definite
Grade 1 — no need
Grade 2 — little need
Grade 3 — moderate need
Grade 4 — great need
Grade 5 — very great need
Andrews’ six keys
Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON)
These six keys , not a method classification.
Serve as a goal, Occasionally at the end of treatment it is not possible to achieve a good Class I occlusion in such cases it is helpful to look at each of these features in order to evaluate.
Incorporates features of both (IOTN) and (PAR).
Peer Assessment Rating(PAR)
The total sum gives a pretreatment score, which is said to reflect the need for, and likely complexity of, the treatment required.
Correct molar relationship
Correct crown angulation: all tooth crowns are angulated mesially
Correct crown inclination: incisors are inclined towards the labial surface.
No rotations
No spaces
Flat occlusal plane
Primarily to measure the success of treatment.
The difference between the PAR parameters scores can be calculated, before and at the end of treatment.
Gives an indication of the severity of a malocclusion.