Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
If landscape were the genius of creation
And neither man nor serpent played a role
And God must look to wind for lamentation
And not to picture postcards of the soul,
If God had stopped work after the fifth day
With Eden full of vegetables and fruits,
If oak and lilac held exclusive sway
Over a kingdom made of stems and roots,
Would he have rested on his bank of cloud
With nothing in the universe to lose,
Or would he hunger for a human crowd?
Which would a wise and just creator choose:
Paraphrase
If God had stopped work after the fifth day with Eden full of vegetables and fruits, if oak and lilac had sole power over a kingdom of stems and roots, if landscape were the genius of creation and neither man nor serpent played a role and God must look to wind for woe and not to picture postcards of the soul, would he have rested on his cloud with nothing in the universe to lose, or would he hunger for human company? Which would a wise and just creator choose: the green praises of a budding leaf or the strict deal between love and grief?
The green hosannas of a budding leaf
Or the strict contract between love and grief?
Tone
Title
The poem refers to a utopian façade where there is no such thing as perfection, creating a setting of bleakness and hopelessness. The title is ironic and a paradox.
Tone
Tone: Inquisitive, dreary, and cynical
Background
The poem alludes to Genesis I (the creation of the world) and the fall of Adam and Eve.
Shifts
God’s conflict -> → God's choice
Hypothetical question →-> Decisive question
Title
The title refers to God’s universe without humanity who inflict pain upon him by their mortality yet he questions if he could withstand the loneliness that accompanies this choice. With no one to enjoy life with, no one to love, God wonders if his paradise is truly paradise.
Biography
Theme
Although the poet utilizes God and creation to emphasize the impact humanity has in paradise, it also alludes to one’s capacity to withstand solitude as one requires love though it may bring suffering. Thus, Pastan affirms that loss is worth it in the end as existence without love is fruitless.
Questions
What is the significance of the poem being divided into two questions?
Why does Pastan employ God and Creation to convey loss?
Why did the author never capitalize “he” even when referencing God?