is loading.
Chapter 1
0:00
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
1x
Poster image

Audio Transcript Auto-generated

  • 00:01 - 00:05

    E Enterprise for the environment project success stories.

  • 00:06 - 00:10

    E permitting return on investment or R O I calculator,

  • 00:11 - 00:14

    E Enterprise was exploring how to modernize

  • 00:14 - 00:16

    the permitting process through E permitting.

  • 00:16 - 00:19

    An E enterprise work group recommended that R Y metrics

  • 00:19 - 00:23

    be developed to enable state adoption of E permitting systems.

  • 00:25 - 00:28

    The E Enterprise Leadership Council suggested the creation of a tool for

  • 00:28 - 00:31

    states to estimate potential increased economic

  • 00:31 - 00:33

    activity and efficiencies from E permitting

  • 00:34 - 00:38

    E P S Office of Land and Emergency Management worked with States on an E Enterprise

  • 00:38 - 00:42

    team to develop a tool to determine the R O I for an E permitting system.

  • 00:43 - 00:46

    The result is an easy to use tool for any state

  • 00:46 - 00:50

    tribe or community to use to support transition to electronic permitting.

  • 00:51 - 00:55

    Arizona used the calculator to estimate over 100 and $45 million per

  • 00:55 - 00:59

    year in economic benefits to the state from their E permitting portal

  • 01:01 - 01:03

    quality assurance project plans or cop

  • 01:05 - 01:08

    tribes are having trouble getting their crops approved in a timely manner

  • 01:08 - 01:12

    and we're spending a significant portion of their grant funds on developing crops.

  • 01:13 - 01:16

    States were experiencing similar issues around long waits,

  • 01:16 - 01:18

    inconsistencies and a lack of Transparency.

  • 01:19 - 01:22

    States and tribes came together through e enterprise in

  • 01:22 - 01:25

    collaboration with the Office of Mission Support in the regions

  • 01:25 - 01:30

    to improve the timeliness, consistency and transparency of the process.

  • 01:31 - 01:34

    The result is that EPA States and tribes work together to improve the

  • 01:34 - 01:37

    process and procedures and optimize technology support.

  • 01:38 - 01:40

    The approval times for coops have been shortened and

  • 01:40 - 01:42

    are now monitored as a result of this initiative,

  • 01:45 - 01:47

    regulation, navigation or rig

  • 01:47 - 01:48

    nav

  • 01:49 - 01:52

    the regulated community and regulators wanted an easier way to

  • 01:52 - 01:56

    understand and navigate complex Federal Clean Air Act rule,

  • 01:56 - 01:58

    applicability and requirements.

  • 01:59 - 02:02

    E P S Office of Air and Radiation developed online

  • 02:02 - 02:06

    interactive tools using the Texas Commission on environmental qualities,

  • 02:06 - 02:08

    air quality regulation, flow charts for reference.

  • 02:09 - 02:10

    With these tools,

  • 02:10 - 02:14

    the regulated community answers successive questions resulting in personalized

  • 02:14 - 02:19

    documents outlining the regulatory requirements for specific circumstances.

  • 02:20 - 02:23

    This also provides a ready reference tool for code regulators.

  • 02:24 - 02:26

    The result is that these tools

  • 02:26 - 02:29

    reduce compliance assistance requests to government agencies

  • 02:29 - 02:33

    and simplify and encourage compliance with CAA regulations,

  • 02:36 - 02:39

    state planning electronic collaboration system or specs

  • 02:41 - 02:42

    under the Clean Air Act,

  • 02:42 - 02:45

    state and local air agencies are responsible for

  • 02:45 - 02:48

    developing and submitting state implementation plans to epa

  • 02:49 - 02:50

    the same agencies may also submit

  • 02:50 - 02:54

    exceptional event notifications and demonstrations,

  • 02:54 - 02:58

    both sip and exceptional event demonstration submissions are frequently

  • 02:58 - 03:02

    comprised of multiple documents containing tens or hundreds of pages

  • 03:03 - 03:03

    E

  • 03:03 - 03:07

    P S Office of Air and Radiation Built Reporting tools with

  • 03:07 - 03:10

    software that could also be used for other unstructured data like sips

  • 03:11 - 03:13

    in the spirit of build ones used many times.

  • 03:13 - 03:15

    This software was used to launch specs

  • 03:16 - 03:19

    a user-friendly web based system that enables state air agencies

  • 03:19 - 03:23

    to officially submit information electronically for review and approval.

  • 03:25 - 03:27

    The result is that currently all 50 states use specs

  • 03:27 - 03:31

    for reporting sips eliminating the need for paper submissions.

  • 03:31 - 03:34

    More than 1600 sips have now been submitted through specs

  • 03:34 - 03:38

    and approximately 100 and 25 exceptional events such as

  • 03:38 - 03:40

    for wildfires have also been submitted through the system

  • 03:44 - 03:46

    assessment total maximum daily load tracking

  • 03:46 - 03:49

    and implementation system or attains.

  • 03:50 - 03:53

    Tribes discussed challenges they were facing in reporting

  • 03:53 - 03:56

    their water quality assessment decisions to epa.

  • 03:56 - 03:59

    One challenge was the time it took to create lengthy reports.

  • 04:00 - 04:04

    The attains tribal pilot was started to provide a more streamlined way

  • 04:04 - 04:07

    for interested tribes to electronically submit

  • 04:07 - 04:10

    water quality assessment decisions to EPA

  • 04:10 - 04:12

    to prepare for submitting Du Attains.

  • 04:12 - 04:16

    EPA helped tribes create assessment methodology documents

  • 04:16 - 04:18

    improving tribal water quality assessments.

  • 04:19 - 04:22

    Having assessment data electronically maintains allows this data to

  • 04:22 - 04:24

    be shared to the public through house my waterway.

  • 04:26 - 04:28

    The result is that an increasing number of tribes

  • 04:28 - 04:32

    are using attains to submit their assessment data to EPA

  • 04:32 - 04:36

    attains is now an approved optional reporting mechanism under the Clean Water Act.

  • 04:40 - 04:42

    And finally, the tribal water quality data road map

  • 04:44 - 04:46

    tribes discussed challenges they were facing in

  • 04:46 - 04:48

    reporting their water quality monitoring data.

  • 04:49 - 04:52

    One challenge was a high turnover rate of staff and they felt like they were starting

  • 04:52 - 04:54

    over every two years as new staff learned

  • 04:54 - 04:57

    how to sample and report water quality data.

  • 04:58 - 05:02

    The tribal water quality data road map was developed to provide

  • 05:02 - 05:04

    a step by step guide to reporting water quality data.

  • 05:05 - 05:07

    The tools excel based and not solely web-based

  • 05:07 - 05:10

    since many tribes don't have reliable internet connections.

  • 05:10 - 05:12

    However, with an internet connection,

  • 05:12 - 05:16

    it also provided users access to past water quality reports

  • 05:16 - 05:19

    and analysis and trends for tribes water quality data.

  • 05:20 - 05:22

    The result is that tribes are using the road map to

  • 05:23 - 05:27

    prepare for water quality data submissions to the water quality exchange.

  • 05:27 - 05:31

    And the road map project sparked not only the development of the road map tool but

  • 05:31 - 05:34

    also the creation of new easy to understand

  • 05:34 - 05:37

    water quality exchange training documents and videos.