Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
and this
Kelly, Jon. "Should Anti-tattoo Discrimination Be Illegal?" BBC News. BBC News Magazine, 13 Nov. 2015. Web.
"Body Art Discrimination: Violation of the First Amendment?" Project Censored The News That Didn't Make The News. 14 May 2014. Web. 13 Nov. 2015.
Schenk, Carolyn, and Rebecca Holman. "A Sociological Approach to Brand Choices the Concept of Situational Self Image." Association For Consumer Research. Association For Consumer Research, 7 Jan. 1980. Web. 4 Dec. 2015.
Kendall, Diana. "6 DEVIENCE AND CRIME." SOCIOLOGY IN OUR TIMES. 10th ed. CENEGAGE LEARNING, 2014. 19, 164-196. Print.
Taibi, Catherine. "Tatoos Still Reduce Chances of Getting Fired, Study Finds." HUFF POST LIFE HANDBOOK. States Farm, 5 Sept. 2013. Web. 6 Dec. 2015.
Karim D.O, Reef. "Tattoo Psychology: Art or Self Destruction? Modern-Day Social Branding." HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING. THE BLOG, 9 Nov. 2012. Web. 6 Dec. 2015.
"Tattoos, Piercings and Hiring Discrimination: Get the Facts Here." N.p., 6 Jan. 2014. Web. 7 Dec. 2015.
Marjorie R.Esman. "Saggy Pants Legislation:The Latest In Racial Profiling Laws." New America Media, 8 July 2013. Web. 13 Dec. 2015
Discrimination of tattoos in the workplace violates the First Amendment. ("Body Art")
Many new qualified employees have been turned down job opportunities and have been quickly fired because of their tattoos.
("Should Anti-tattoo Discrimination Be Illegal." Web.)
Tattoos display significant meanings to the owners (sometimes religious and personal). ("Body Art")
Employers ask employees to cover thier tattoos, but having tatoos lowers the chances of people being hired for a job.("Should Anti-tattoo Discrimination Be Illegal." Web.)
People who have tattoos are more likley to be stigmatized negatively by others. ("A Sociological Approach")
Wesley Bolin- Worked at Dairy Queen ("Body Art")
Jo Perkins- Consultant in Milton Keynes ("Should Anti-tattoo Discrimination Be Illegal." Web.)
Mother of three- Waitress in Yorkshire ("Should Anti-tattoo Discrimination Be Illegal." Web.)
Saggy-Pants Laws Target Minorities
Saggy Pant Laws Violate A Basic First Amendment Right To Free Speech And The Liberty Interest In Expression.
An Individuals Liberty Interest Is A Basic Right That Falls Under The Same Category As The Other Liberties Guaranteed Under The U.S. Constitution.
Based On A World Wide Clothing Trend Police Target Certain Communities, Usually The Black Community.
This Racially Based Profiling Leads To A Disproportionate Amount Of Black Males Being Stopped And Searched Unnecessarily, Which In Turn Leads To Senseless Arrests For Minor Offenses.
There Is No Proof That The "Saggy Pants" Epidemic Has Caused An Increase In Crime Across The Country.
Lawmakers Should Consider The Cost, Both Human And Fiscal, Of Criminalizing Harmless Behavior at The Public's Expense.
Saggy Pants Legislation
The Latest in Racial Profiling Laws
From The District of Colombia, London to Paris, Africa to Albania, Mostly Young Men Have Adapted to Wearing Their Pants Sagging Below Their Waist Line. This "Fashion" Phenomenon Began In America's Prison System. However, Many Local U.S. City Officials Do Not Consider Sagging Pants Fashion At All. In Fact Many People Consider This Trend Ridiculous and Thuggish.