Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Fourth World Geopolitics
Geopolitics:
“the contention between the great powers and aspiring great powers for control over territory, resources, and important geographical positions, such as ports and harbors, canals, river systems, oases, and other sources of wealth and influence.”
Fourth World Geopolitics:
is the conduct of social, economic, political, and strategic analysis of relations between nations and states. Uses history, sociology, politics, philosophy to explain the nature of the nation and state contention.
Ryser argues that the Fourth World will have increased relevance in global issues, such as climate change.
In what ways, do you think, Fourth World nations can contribute to addressing pressing global issues?
How can states better recognize these contributions and include Fourth World actors in decision-making?
International Relations Theory
The World Council of Indigenous Peoples promises to “control again [Fourth World Nations'] own destiny and recover [their] complete humanity."
In what ways, do you think, the Council and its mandate could affect relations with other nations and states?
What role would nationalism play?
1. Common discourse: Realpolitik vs. Universalism
2. New General theory in IR over the last few decades of the 20th century has combined elements from both sides.
3. The challenges Fourth World people's have in economic, political, social terms have caused changes in how IR is understood.
- How people imagine the EU as well as their place within it are key in understanding people’s identities
- The EU has allowed member nations to 'forgive and forget'.
-"Being European"
1. Fourth World Geopolitics
2. European Union
3. Discussion
- The EU rests on several pillars
- Are these enough to generate loyalty for the EU?
(Ex. Greek Debt Crisis and Brexit)
- The fact that a European identity is not fully developed leaves the door open for nationalism to return
Is it an asset or a drawback that the European Union was constructed as a 'non-emotional' entity? Why?
1. Malta is characterized by an extremely polarized political system. The party people identify with has social implications.
2. Joining the EU was hotly debated
3. Joining the EU created a shared Maltese perspective.
1. Mutually Exclusive Conceptions of Identity
(Example: European vs. Englishman)
2. Other conceptions of identity: layered identity, nested identity, hybrid identities.
3. EU allows for the flourishing of different national identities.
The Implications of EU membership for Cyprus have been varied and revolve around:
1. A transformative effect on Cyprotism as a national identity.
2. Taming irredentist claims on the Greek Cyprot side.
Has the EU been able to moderate national identities in Europe?
If so, how has this been achieved?
If not, can nationalism be moderated?
In the case of Hungary, joining the EU had several implications:
1. Eliminated Irredentism (free movement of people)
2. Rejection of 'blood and soil' policies and along with this a reinvention of the Hungarian identity in a non threatening way
With recent events (Brexit, Greek Debt Crisis, increased immigration, etc.) and moving into the future, does the EU still have relevance?
If so, how do you suggest the EU accommodate these growing challenges?
If not the EU, how will these challenges be addressed?
By Marnie Howlett and Fabian Montoya Fendt