Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • Ease in administration,
  • taking scoring, timing
  • Language level
  • Multiple Languages
  • Norming Sample
  • Audio Component
  • Trait (vs. State)

Limitations

Multicultural

Considerations

  • yes/no ... severity
  • yes/no can be anxiety provoking
  • Lacks a built in measure for someone acting anxious when they’re not
  • Does anxiety present itself across all cultures in the same way?
  • No time frame for symptoms
  • T-scores not broken down by gender
  • Options when reporting demographics
  • Translated into multiple Languages

Sample Scores

  • Second norming study for minorities: seeking a more meaningful mean!
  • 3,086 children
  • 874 African American/Black
  • 495 Latino/Hispanic
  • 1,369 other
  • No significant or meaningful

differences

Margaux (took as an anxious child)

  • Raw Score 32
  • T-score
  • DEF 3
  • INC 0

Emily (as a non-anxious child)

  • Raw Score 18
  • T-score
  • DEF 0
  • INC 2

Test Construction

Target Population

Children and Adolescents aged 6-19

Norming Sample

  • Scoring categories normed in various age groups: 6-8, 9-14, 15-19
  • 2,368 individuals aged 6-19 representative of the US population in terms of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status
  • Geographical breakdown
  • 23% NE, 25% MW, 33% S, 20% W
  • Little to no impact of demographic factors

Validity

  • All of the research discussed is regarded as fundamentally relevant to the validity of the RCMAS-2 scores because of the substantial overlap between the two forms – 89% of the RCMAS items are retained in the RCMAS-2

High correlation (r = .85, p < .001) between the RCMAS and the STAIC Trait Scale (1980)

Reliability

  • .92 (improved over RCMAS)
  • Each subscale varies between .75 and .86

The Basics

Research regarding Multiculturalism

  • 49 item self-report instrument designed to assess the level and nature of anxiety in children and adolescents ages 6-19

  • Each response is “yes” or “no”
  • Very easy and quick to admnister

  • Developed in the SE United States and created based on a sample of about 300 children and adolescents - * this is not the norming sample

Use

  • Level B assessment

  • Can be administered in school settings, clinical settings, & private practice settings

Can the RCMAS-2 be used to diagnose?

“The RACMAS-2 is designed to be useful in helping gauge a child’s or adolescent’s overall level of anxiety. It is not designed to assist in placing the child into one or another anxiety-related diagnostic subcategory.” (p. 17)

Comorbidities!

  • Mansoor & Ahmad (2010) Research on the reliability of the short term RCMAS-2 in Pakistan

  • Ang, Lowe, & Yusof (2011) Research on the use of RCMAS-2 U.S. norms with Singaporean children

Scoring Procedure

Subscales

  • Raw Score
  • Subscales
  • T-score
  • Short Form

PHY - physiological anxiety

WOR - worry

SOC - social anxiety

TOT - total anxiety

Inconsistent Responding Index (INC)

DEF (Defensiveness)

Conclusion & Implications

Lowe, 2012

References

The Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale, Second Edition

(RCMAS-2)

Lowe, P. A. (2014). A Closer Look at the

Psychometric Properties of the Revised Children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1-14. doi: 10.1177/0734282914528611

Ang, R. P., Lowe, P. A., & Yusof, N. (2011). An

Examination of the RCMAS-2 Scores Across Gender, Ethnic Background, and Age in a Large Asian School Sample. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 899-910. doi: 10.1037/a0023891

Mansoor, I., & Ahmad, R. (2010). Reliability

Assessment of the Short Form of Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS-2) in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 41(1), 3-13.

Reynolds, C.R., & Richmond, B.O. (2008). Revised

Chilren's Manifest Anxiety Scale: Second Edition. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

RCMAS-2 is a great instrument for mental health professionals to use in the assessment of those students who experience moderate to high levels of anxiety

  • Splitting up the factors can help with treatment planning
  • High score on the Social Anxiety dimension = social skills training
  • High score on the Worry dimension = CBT
  • High score on the Physiological Anxiety dimension = Mindfulness, meditation, deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation training

What does the research say?

  • Lowe (2012) Research study on psychometric properties of the RCMAS-2 and Gender
  • Sample: 1,003 U.S. children ages 7 to 19 (Grades 2-12)
  • 45.8% males and 54.2%females
  • Ethnic/racial composition
  • Analyzed gender differences
  • Findings...

Emily

Margaux

& Chelsea

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi