- the simulacrum is a copy with no original
- Baudrillard calls this the "order of sorcery"
- simulated realm
- hyperreality
Jean Baudrillard
the four successive phases of images
re-presentation
Classical theory
Post-modernism
binary oppositions
blurred
how we present something?
what is a good presentation ?
Truth / False
Depth / Surface
Meaning / Appearance
Mind / Body
Center / Margin
Simulations
and
Simulacrum
draw, taking pictures, dictate (for reality)
Signifier & Singnified
Signified: the ides of signifier
Signifier: words
sign= the depth of reality
arbitrary
relational
constitutive
(by Sassure)
...etc.
The second stage:
sign misrepresents or distorts the reality behind it.
- sign= perversion of reality
- the sign to be an unfaithful copy
- "masks and denatures" reality as an "evil appearance—it is of the order of maleficence"
- the sign hints at the existence of an obscure reality which the sign itself is incapable of encapsulating
The fourth stage:
sign bears no relation to any reality at all
image has departed from reference and has its own system
(image simulacrum)
- pure simulation
- simulacrum has no any relationship to the reality
Classical
The first stage:
the sign represents a basic reality
Post-modernism
image
reference
image
- a faithful image/copy
- a sign is a "reflection of a profound reality"
- Baudrillard called "the sacramental order"
reference
'The Fever Van'
L. S. Lowry, 1935
Disneyland
(deterrence machine)
The third stage:
the sign disguises the fact that there is no corresponding reality underneath
hyperreality
watergate
intertexuality
(not scandal,but a parody)
simulacrum
reference
Reality A
(moral order)
A Scandal
X
- the intertexuality of the simulations and simulacrum
- no specific separation between real and fiction
- there's no real, but only hyperreality because the reality is no longer existed
- the appearance is a lie
- pretence of reality( no model)
intertexuality
X
{Event}
president Nixon, wiretapping of the Democratic Party's headquarters
X
X
X
the hyperreality
Jean Baudrillard argues that a simulacrum is not a copy of the real, but becomes truth in its own right.