Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
INGENIERIA Y MANTENIMIENTO
10 Improvement
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
10.2.1 and 10.2.2
The organization shall have processes and systems in place to prevent shipment
of non-conforming product to any Ford Motor Company facility.
The organization should analyze any non-conforming product or process output
using the 8D methodology to ensure root cause correction and problem
prevention.
9.3 Management review
9.3.1.1 Management review — supplemental
The organization management shall hold monthly QOS (Quality Operating
System) performance meetings as specified in the Q1 Manufacturing Site
Assessment available on https://web.qpr.ford.com/sta/Q1.html. The results of
these QOS performance reviews shall be integral to the senior management
reviews.
Customer Concerns
Organizations shall respond to Quality Rejects (QRs) by:
Note: The clock starts once Ford has sent the notification to the organization
• Responding in 24 hours
• Implementing containment in the Ford plant. The organization and/or third
party must follow local procedures and site rules while carrying out
containment.
• Providing certified stock
10.2.5 Warranty management systems
Organizations shall comply with the requirements in the Ford Production
Purchasing Global Terms & Conditions (PPGT&Cs), Applicable Web Guides, Q1 Requirements and the Manufacturing Site Assessment https://web.qpr.ford.com/sta/Q1.html.
9 Performance evaluation
9.3.2 Management review inputs
Management review input must also include the Q1 Manufacturing Site
Assessment results
9.1.1.2 Identification of statistical tools
The organization shall use the latest edition of the following references as
appropriate:
See IATF 16949 for applicable references
Process Capability
The capability index for reporting launch process capability and ongoing
production process capability is Ppk (Performance Index)
See Ford’s PPAP customer specifics for the launch process capability
requirements. https://web.qpr.ford.com/sta/Ford_Specifics_for_PPAP.pdf
See table A below for ongoing process capability requirements.
The organization shall maintain ongoing process capability at Ppk > 1.33.
The requirement for maintenance of ongoing process capability is to be included
in the production Control Plan and the capability results recorded in the
APQP/PPAP Evidence Workbook.
The results of monitoring process capability are to be available to Ford upon
request.
9.2.2.3 Manufacturing process audit
Ford Manufacturing Process Assessment Requirements
The organization is responsible to ensure that all tiers of suppliers are assessed to the applicable Ford manufacturing process standards.
Note: Self-assessment by the sub-tier suppliers, including implementation of corrective action plans as required, meets this requirement.
Refer to https://web.qpr.ford.com/sta/Ford_GTS.html on Ford Supplier Portal for all these standards except AIAG CQI-xx, which are available through AIAG.
Ford Supplier Manufacturing Health Chart Requirements
The organization shall assess compliance to Critical to Quality process requirements in accordance with APQP
9.1.2 Customer satisfaction
The organization shall monitor performance and customer satisfaction metrics
(as defined by Q1) and updates to Ford requirements on Ford Supplier Portal
(FSP) https://fsp.covisint.com.
At least twice per year, the organization shall communicate customer satisfaction
metrics to all employees who affect the quality of Ford Motor Company parts.
AIAG CQI-9 "Special Process:
Heat Treat System Assessment"
Sistemas de Calidad
8.5.2 Annual MMOG/LE assessment completed and reported 1 May to 31 July each
Incoming & Operation
8.6.6 Acceptance criteria
For guidance on product monitoring and reaction plan techniques for product
conformance to specification, see the references AIAG SPC and APQP.
8.4.2.4 Supplier monitoring
In support of Ford's expectation of 100% on-time delivery, the organization shall
also require 100% on-time delivery from sub-tier suppliers.
STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQ.
8.4.2.3 Supplier quality management system development
The organization may meet this requirement by successful assessments of the
MAQMS Sub-tier suppliers per the authorization
Control de Documentos
#8 OPERATION
7.2.1 Competence
Ford training opportunities are available through Ford Supplier Learning Institute
Engineering Specifications
7.5.2 Creating and updating
6.1.2.3 The Organization shall have a documented Supply Risk Management Operating
System in place –
The Organization shall ensure that its Quality Operating System Supply Risk
Management process includes:
• The application of the requirements for Risk analysis, preventive actions and
contingency planning described in section 6.1.2.1 through 6.1.2.3 of IATF
16949:2016 through the Organization’s supply chain.
• Documentation of the Organization’s supply chain (supplier name, location,
parts) for all Ford-specified parts and associated raw materials
#7 Support
7.1.3.1 Plant, facility, and equipment planning
The Capacity Analysis Report is available through
https://web.qpr.ford.com/sta/Capacity_Analysis_Report.xlsx
MSA
6.1.2.3 Contingency plans:
The Organization shall notify the Ford receiving plant, the buyer and the STA
engineer within 24 hours of organization production interruption. The
organization shall communicate the nature of the problem to Ford and take
immediate actions to assure supply of product to Ford.
Note: Production interruption is defined as an inability to meet the Ford specified
production capacity volume.
Supply Chain Risk Analysis
YES
Similar to IATF 16949, the CSR are divided into 10 topics, which they can be audited from # 4
Hi, could you please help me?
Do you know what are the Ford customer specific requirements and where I can find it?
#4
The structure of this document aligns with the requirements with the applicable sections
of IATF 16949. Several section are followed by the statement “No Ford
Customer-Specific Requirement for this section” to verify that there is no auditable Fordspecific
requirement for this section.
1.-
Are customer specific requirements audited?
1 Scope: The organization shall address all IATF16949:2016 requirements including the requirements of
this document in the organization’s quality management system.
#3
Terms and definitions:
IATF (International Automotive Task Force)
Average Production Weekly (APW)
Maximum Production Weekly (MPW)
MPPC?????
#2
Must, shall
Normative references: Any question about the applicability of a specific reference should be directed to the
organization’s Supplier Technical Assistance engineer.
#5
5.1.2 Customer focus
The organization shall demonstrate enhanced customer satisfaction by meeting the continuous improvement requirements of Q1, as demonstrated in the organization’s QOS (Quality Operating System).
5.3.1 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities - supplemental
The organization shall notify Ford Motor Company Supplier Technical Assistance in writing within 10 working days of any changes to senior management responsible for Product Quality or company ownership.
Juan Villareal