Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

INTRO

"Of pain you could ONLY wish one thing:

that it should stop"

George Orwell.

PREPARED AND PRESENTED BY:

Name

Sara Darweesh.

Title

PREPARED AND PRESENTED BY

Product Specialist at Dubimed.

Life Goal

Changing patients' lives.

Lifelong Belief

Deserving life demands adding values and searching

for them around.

Thank you for being a special part in my journey.

Agenda

PRP TECHNIQUE (TROPOCELLS) ROLE IN IMPROVING PATIENTS' QUALITY OF LIFE

1-Osteoarthritis (Definition- Risk Factors- Grades/Stages-Signs and Symptoms) .

2-Osteoarthritis management techniques.

3-The advantages of PRP VS the other techniques.

4-Clinical trails about PRP.

5- Guidelines in osteoarthritis management.

6- (Platelets as miracle)

7-Questions.

8-Let's win the Battle.

OSTEOARTHRITIS

Risk Factors

Defination

Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis, affecting millions of people worldwide. It occurs when the protective cartilage that cushions the ends of your bones wears down over time. Although osteoarthritis can damage any joint, the disorder most commonly affects joints in your hands, knees, hips and spine.

• Older age.

• Sex.

• Obesity.

• Joint injuries/Trauma.

• Repeated stress on the joint/Overuse.

• Genetics.

• Bone deformities.

• Certain metabolic diseases.

Grades/Stages

• Grade 0 (none)

Definite absence of x-ray changes of osteoarthritis.

• Grade 1 (Doubtful)

Doubtful joint space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping.

• Grade 2 (Minimal)

Definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing.

• Grade 3 (Moderate)

Moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of joint space and some sclerosis and possible deformity of bone ends.

• Grade 4 (Severe)

Large osteophytes, marked narrowing of joint space, severe sclerosis and definite deformity of bone ends.

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

Signs And Symptoms

• Pain.

Affected joints might hurt during or after movement.

• Stiffness.

Joint stiffness might be most noticeable upon awakening or after being inactive.

• Tenderness.

Your joint might feel tender when you apply light pressure to or near it.

• Loss of flexibility.

You might not be able to move your joint through its full range of motion.

• Grating sensation.

You might feel a grating sensation when you use the joint, and you might hear popping or crackling.

• Bone spurs.

These extra bits of bone, which feel like hard lumps, can form around the affected joint.

• Swelling.

This might be caused by soft tissue inflammation around the joint.

OSTEOARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES

Osteoarthritis Management Techniques.

B-Pharmacological Therapy

D-Replacement Surgery.

c-Intra-articular

Injections.

A- Non pharmacological

interventions.

• Patient education.

• Heat and cold.

• Weight Control.

• Exercise

• Physical therapy

• Supportive devices

• PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma).

• Sodium hyaluronate (Hyaluronic Acid).

• Corticosteroid.

• Stem Cell (Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)).

• Prolotherapy.

• Acetaminophen

• Oral NSAIDs

• Topical NSAIDs

• Tramadol

• Duloxetine

• Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate.

PRP VS the Non pharmacological intervention.

PRP VS THE OTHER MANAGEMENT TECHNEQES

1-Efficacy-wise

Much More effective either in pain relief or in controlling progression Targeting not only the symptoms but also the source.

2-Compliance-wise

Extra Patients' compliance.

3-Guidline-wise

According to all Guidelines Non pharmacological intervention could be effective at grade1, but it has no main role may be supportive role in grade 2 and 3 which are the most common.

PRP VS THE PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY

1-Efficacy-wise

Targeting not only the symptoms but also the source.

2-Compliance-wise

Extra Patients' compliance.

3-Safety-wise

All NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) have deleterious effects on blood pressure, edema, and kidney function. And all of them are contraindicated in patients with peptic ulcer and cardiovascular events.

Duloxetine was also associated with significantly more nausea, dry mouth, constipation, fatigue, and decreased appetite

PRP VS THE OTHER INTRA-ARTICULAR INJECTIONS

•Sodium hyaluronate /Hyaluronic Acid (Viscosupplementation).

1-Efficacy-wise

Although it is FDA approved as a treatment for osteoarthritis, there are most of promising clinical trails published at very trusted journals and performed at very reputable universities the main results of them demonstrate that PRP has superior effect when compared with HA and the rest demonstrate comparable outcomes between PRP and HA.

2-Compliance-wise

Almost The same ( Better at PRP because the duration of after-injection is longer with HA).

3-Safety-wise

Synthetically manufactured product not autologous.

May elicit an inflammatory response and possible effusion..

Some have the clinically distinct acute inflammatory side effect (ie, severe acute inflammatory reaction [SAIR] or HA-associated intra-articular pseudosepsis.

CORTICOSTEROID

1-Efficacy-wise

The effect may last, on average, anywhere from 4 to 6 weeks per injection, but the benefit is unlikely to continue beyond that time frame ( Short-term effect).

2-Compliance-wise

PRP is better due to the less number of injections and the wide time interval.

3-Safety-wise

Chondrotoxicity (chondrolysis) is a potential drawback.( The increased usage of corticosteroid injections can lead to cartilage breakdown in a small number of patients).

Rare soft tissue effects, such as skin depigmentation, cutaneous atrophy, and fat necrosis have also been reported in corticosteroid use.

PROLOTHERAPY

1-Efficacy-wise

Prolotherapy has not been researched extensively.

2-Compliance-wise

Very poor due to the severe side effects.

3-Safety-wise

The worst side effect is an infection at the site of an injection.

Another side effect may be temporary swelling or pain where the injection occurred. Immediately following the procedure, the affected joint may feel worse before beginning to feel better.

1-Efficacy-wise

There is a lack of strong clinical trial evidence supporting the use of MSCs in OA management.

2-Compliance-wise

Stem cell harvest is more invasive than the simple blood draw required for PRP.

3-Safety-wise

Stem cells harvest technique could increase the likelihood of infection or complications.

Note: In many cases, PRP and stem cells are injected together because they complement one another and enhance your results.

STEM CELLS (MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS (MSCs)

Clinical trails about PRP in knee osteoarthritis management.

Clinical trails about PRP in knee osteoarthritis management.

THE EFFECTS OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA INJECTIONS IN KNEE AND HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLEDTRIALS.

This is a June 2020 study from the journal Clinical Rheumatology.

Researchers suggested that “Intra-articular PRP injection provided better effects than other injections for osteoarthritis patients, especially in knee osteoarthritis patients, in terms of pain reduction and function improvement at short-term follow-up. (At 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 months).

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32533337/

MRI CHANGES AFTER PLATELET-RICH PLASMA INJECTION IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS (RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL).

A January 2020 study published in the Journal of pain research investigated the effect of PRP on cartilage characteristics by special MRI sequencing in knee osteoarthritis patients. All the patients were women and about 58 years old.

There was a significant effect on radiologic characteristics (patellofemoral cartilage volume and synovitis ).

An April 2020 study lead by the Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, published in The American journal of sports medicine suggested: “Patients undergoing treatment for knee osteoarthritis with PRP can be expected to experience improved clinical outcomes when compared with hyaluronic acid.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302218/

PLATELET-RICH PLASMA VERSUS HYALURONIC ACID FOR KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS.

IS PLATELET-RICH PLASMA EFFECTIVE FOR THE TREATMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF LEVEL 1 AND 2 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS.

In February 2020, a multi-national team of researchers published findings in the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &Traumatology .

Comparing intra-articular knee injection of PRP and hyaluronic acid and the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that PRP is superior to hyaluronic acid for symptomatic knee pain at 6 and 12 months.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32060630/

GUIDELINES IN OSTEOARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT.

1-The ACR/Arthritis Foundation (American college of Rheumatology) guidelines strongly recommend against use of the Platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee osteoarthritis.

2- AAOS ( American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons) is not against or with the use of PRP in knee osteoarthritis.

3- According to OARSI (The Osteoarthritis Research Society International).

• The use of acetaminophen (paracetamol) is conditionally not recommended.

• The use of oral and transdermal opioids is strongly not recommended.

• For individuals with cardiovascular comorbidities or frailty, the use of any oral NSAID is not recommended. (11)

PLATELETS AS MIRACLE

PLATELETS AS MIRACLE

QUESTIONS

QUESTIONS

LET'S WIN THE BATTLE!

LET'S WIN THE BATTLE!

Thank

You

Thank

You

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi