Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

MANAGEMENT OF SPLENIC TRAUMA

A GUIDELINES REVIEW

Vullong K

Overview

OUTLINE

01.

Introduction

02.

Relevant Anatomy

03.

Epidemiology and Mechanism of Injury

04.

Classification and grading of splenic injury

05.

Evolution of Management

OUTLINE

06.

Overview of WSES Guidelines

07.

Overview of EAST Guidelines

08.

An Algorithm for Addenbrooke's

08.

Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

CM, 43yr M.

Assault by group, no weapons, non-penetrating Abd trauma

At admission, CM was Vocal, Clear lung fields, HD stable, Hb 137

Summary of Injuries

  • Head and Neck NAD, C-Spine cleared
  • Splenic laceration, no active bleeding- for conservative management
  • Left flail chest (Rib score 13)- PCA, Lidocaine patch, Paracetamol
  • Small apical pneumothorax- monitored
  • Mild left Hemothorax- Papworth input
  • Fracture Left iliac blade- Ni intervention, can mobilise
  • Manibrium fracture with small mediastinal hepatoma- ECG sinus rhythm nad, analgesia
  • New (at 48Hrs) moderate left haemothorax with higher attenuation dependent layer- Chest drain inserted (600ml drained)

CT Trauma with contrast @ 5hours

Splenic laceration 18 *9mm at the lower pole (Grade II). Slight arterial blush, concerning of an aneurysm

CT Liver tripple phase @48Hours

Splenic laceration with focal area of arterial density unchanged.

DS, 58yr M. Nil Comobidities

Driver of car v lorry, restrained. Difficult extraction, one hour on scene

Transfused 1U PRBC, 2FFP , Laparotomy + Relook at 48Hrs

Summary of Injuries

  • No ICH; Type 3 odontoid PEG # displaced
  • Multiple infarcted distal Juvenal/ileal bowel loops, mesenteric tears
  • splenic infarcts in anterior pole of spleen, Perisplenic haematoma
  • Left abdominal wall muscular injury with haematoma
  • L1st 2nd posterior rib fractures, Lidocaine patch, Paracetamol
  • Commented left olecranon fracture
  • Multiple lumbar transverse process fractures
  • Communited displaced fracture Rt fibular with overlapping fragments

CT Liver tripple phase @48Hours

Possible small linear splenic infarcts in anterior pole of spleen (?artefactual) surrounding small perisplenic haematoma

Introduction

1

The management of Splenic trauma has evolved over the last three decades.

2

Epidemiology and mechanism of splenic trauma hint towards a variable range of presentations and outcomes.

AAST splenic injury scale, most recently revised in 2018.

3

EAST and WSES Guidelines provide a working framework

4

A locally relevant set of guidelines becomes imperative

5

Relevant Anatomy

Odd dimensions: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11,

Ar: Splenic branch of Left Celiac trunk

ANATOMY

Central arteriole>> End arterioles (lack wall)

Vv: Splenic vein, IMA, Portal vein...

Gross: White pulp (25%) and Red pulp (75%)

Mechanism of Injury

Penetrating trauma

EPID/MECH OF INJURY

Blunt trauma

Indirect trauma

Clinical Assessment

Clinical Clues

RELEVANT TO MANAGEMENT

Physical examination may be limited by decreased mental status or distracting injuries **

hypovolemic shock manifesting as tachycardia, and hypotension

tenderness in the upper left quadrant; pleuritic left-sided chest pain

generalized peritonitis, or referred pain to the left shoulder (Kehr's sign)

Associated Injuries to other body regions

Comobidities

Worthy of Note to ascertain

  • Previous operations including splenectomy
  • Liver or portal venous disease
  • The use of an anticoagulant agent
  • Bleeding tendency
  • The use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents.

Grading and Classification

GRADING

Evolution Of Management

Since its introduction in paediatric trauma in the 1960s, Non operative Management (NOM) has been used more commonly, now accounting for up to 60% of cases (Hildebrand et al., 2014)

Data support the safe application of non-operative management to haemodynamically unstable patients

with traumatic splenic injury, particularly in those with low-grade injuries

EVOLUTION

OF MGT.

Prospective research needed to define subgroup appropriate for NOM, and determine long-term outomes of NOM

Options

Management Options

1

Nonoperative Management (NOM)

Angiography/angioembolization (AG/AE)

1b

Operative intervention/ splenectomy

2

Rationale

Approach to decision-making

Laparoscopic splenectomy

CT for blunt splenic injury is ??

(Next slide)

Utility of angiography

Central Tenet...

Correlation of operative and pathological injury grade with computed tomographic grade in the failed nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma

Overview of WSES Guidelines

WSES

The WSES classification divides spleen injuries into three classes:

  • Minor (WSES class I)

  • Moderate (WSES classes II and III)

  • Severe (WSES class IV)

WSES

Grading + Mgt

(Coccolini et al., 2017)

ALGORITHM

WSES (ADULT)

(Coccolini et al., 2017)

WSES (ADULT AND PAED)

(Coccolini et al., 2017)

EAST OVERVIEW

Based on the review and assessment of the selected references, 3 levels of recommendations

Level I: The recommendation is convincingly justifiable based

on the available scientific information alone.

EAST

Level II: The recommendation is reasonably justifiable by available scientific evidence and strongly supported by expert opinion

Level II: The recommendation is supported by available data, but adequate scientific evidence is lacking

Reccommendations

LEVEL I

One Recommendation:

1. Patients who have diffuse peritonitis or who are haemodynamically unstable after blunt abdominal trauma should be

taken urgently for laparotomy.

I

LEVEL II

Five (5) Recommendations:

A routine laparotomy is not indicated in ...

1

The severity of splenic injury (CT) not contraindications to a trial of NOM in a hemodynamically stable patient.

2

CT is a required to evaluate minor splenic trauma...

3

4

Angiography should be considered for ...

5

NOM is an option where monitoring, serial clinical evaluations, and an operating room available for urgent laparotomy are

Level III

Four (4) Recommendations

1

A number of clinical factorsshould dictate the frequency of and need for follow-up imaging

2

Contrast blush on CT scan alone is not an absolute indication for an operation or angiographic intervention.

3

Angiography: an adjunct to nonoperative management or as an investigative tool

4

Pharmacologic prophylaxis to prevent VTE can be used for patients with isolated blunt splenic injuries

?

Unanswered Questions

Frequency of abdominal examinations

Is there a transfusion trigger after which...

Intensity and duration of monitoring

duration and intensity of restricted activity

Click to edit text

Frequency of Hb g/L

Timing of initiating chemical

(DVT) prophylaxis

Time to reinitiating oral intake

postsplenectomy vaccines?

Optimum length of stay

(ICU)

An Algorith for Addenbrooke's

Addenbrooke's

Conclusion

Conclusion

  • Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries is now the treatment modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of the grade of injury.
  • CT imaging remains an invaluable asset in early and long term monitoring of bl splenic trauma patients
  • Emergence of Laparoscopic (operative) options amidst utility of adjunct Angiography and TAE provide justification for prospective studies in long-term outcomes of Operative and NOM

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi