Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
To what extent is the limitation of people's expression of faith ethical and justifiable?
How is people's expression of faith regulated by authority?
Emotion
Faith
Religious knowledge
systems
Ethics
WOK:
AOK:
The limitation of one's right to express personal faith is an impairment of (deontological) ethics and could constitute indirect discrimination.
Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
1
No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.
2
"The court (EU) acknowledged that restrictions on headscarves in the workplace could constitute indirect discrimination."
-
Restrictions on Muslim Women's Dress in the 28 EU Member States (European Court of Human Rights, 2019)
This indirect discrimination depends on the laws established in the religion or cultural belief itself.
"O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) to cover all over their bodies. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful."
- The Koran (Al-Ahzab (33), verse 59)
Banning expression of faith altogether is not a form of discrimination as it promotes neutrality and objectivity.
People have to adhere to the law whether or not it goes against their faith.
"The ECtHR has upheld the bans, failing to find violations of article 9 (religious freedom), article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), or article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights."
Restrictions on Muslim Women's Dress
in the 28 EU Member States (2019)
-
3
"Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others."
"The court (EU) acknowledged that restrictions on headscarves in the workplace could constitute indirect discrimination...
..But the court concluded that such discrimination may be justified by companies’ wish to promote an image of “neutrality” to customers, as long as the ban is the result of a clear and consistent internal policy, and only when it is applied to customer-facing jobs."
-
Restrictions on Muslim Women's Dress in the 28 EU Member States (European Court of Human Rights, 2019)
To what extent can these restrictions constitute indirect discrimination?
Religion and its limitations
"[...] the reality is that millions of women are suffering and being oppressed under religious laws and Islamic governments in many different parts of the world."
Islam & Women's Rights (2002)
Mini-Conclusion
People have to adhere to limitations made by the law but should still have the freedom of fulfilling their duties according to their personal faith.
However, it is difficult to say when religion or one's personal faith is being oppressive as people's view upon such acts are subjective.
AOK:
WOK:
The law, governments and companies should be neutral.
SECULAR ETHICS
Secularism is the indifference to, or rejection or exclusion of, religion and religious considerations.
Ethics is based solely on human faculties such as logic, empathy, reason or moral intuition, and not derived from supernatural revelation or guidance
A French concept of secularism. It discourages religious involvement in government affairs, especially religious influence in the determination of state policies.
If neutrality is the pursuit and the policy of the company then, according to deontological ethics it would be wrong for employees to wear religious symbols.
Ethics is rooted in religion. A lot of laws, countries, and associations are based on religion and belief systems.
...in a survey from 2015, the Eurobarometer concludes that the percentage of Christians in the EU countries is currently 72% (45% Catholic, 11% Protestant, 10% Orthodox, 6% others), and the percentage of those with no religion is 24% (10% atheist, 14% agnostic)
Are there bias from authority towards certain religion?
According to Kant, the idea of God and religion is the basic requirement of ethics.
The Golden Rule:
"Do unto others as you
would wish them do unto you"
Mini-Conclusion
In the pursuit of neutrality, it is important that the authority separates faith from the government.
However, it should not be disregarded that many foundation of the government, law and ethics today come from religion and so it would be hypocritical to limit religious expressions as it would indirectly limit current ethical and moral expressions.
WOK:
AOK:
Legal law does not always mean ethical.
It is right to go against authority to defend the means of personal expression of faith and human rights and for ethical law to grow.
That the act violates the law,
1
2
That the act is performed intentionally,
That the actor anticipates and willingly accepts punitive measures made on the part of the state against him in retaliation for the act.
3
Non-violent resistance in religious rights activism
Activism has played a major role in ending slavery, promoting equality for women, opposing racism, and many other important issues. It often promotes virtue ethics.
Laws exist for a reason. It is NOT right to go against authority as it causes disruption.
Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders or commands of a government or authority.
The motivation for this act is often when a law contradicts the morally right thing to do.
A famous example of civil disobedience is Rosa Parks
If morality is so important, are the motives behind acting morally really all that significant?
Psychological egoism: “every human action is motivated by self interest."
Mini-Conclusion
To say that something is an act of activism or if it was merely an act of egoism in means of civil disobedience, is subjective, and the reaction will depend on each person's view regarding the issue at hand.
To some, Ms. Achbita is an example of a brave woman defending her faith and what she believes in. To others she deserves to be fired for not abiding the company policy.
Conclusion
To have and express faith is a human right, but it can be limited by the law in pursuit of neutrality.
It is important to respect that different parts of the world have different extents expression of faith.
Activism could further modify the laws regarding people's right to express their faith.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/fs_religious_symbols_eng.pdf
https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-03/cp170030en.pdf
https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=48810
https://www.secularism.org.uk/32716.html
https://www.secularismandnonreligion.org/articles/10.5334/snr.75/galley/79/download/
https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592784.001.0001/acprof-9780199592784
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/restrictions-on-women%27s-dress-in-the-28-eu-member-states-20180425.pdf
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/restrictions-on-women%27s-dress-in-the-28-eu-member-states-20180425.pdf
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/28/religious-restrictions-among-the-worlds-most-populous-countries-2/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-2230.12332
https://www.abc.net.au/religion/limitation-of-religious-freedom/10295842
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Religion-Limits-the-Freedom-of-Human-Beings-FKCG7K5ZVC
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Religion-And-Its-Effects-On-Human-Beings-P3VY53ECF9L5
https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomReligion/Pages/Standards.aspx
https://www.humanistperspectives.org/issue168/11-12_pp37-41_RAND-Secularism_NIXON-Rational_v02.pdf
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/human-rights-act/article-9-freedom-thought-belief-and-religion
http://www.famafrique.org/oppression.htm
https://www.learnreligions.com/deontology-and-ethics-249865
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/openglobalrights-openpage/paradox-of-religion-and-rights/
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/importance-obeying-rules-regulations-workplace-18690.html
http://kentuckytoday.com/stories/civil-disobedience-can-be-selfish-and-wrong-yet-it-can-also-be-appropriate,1464
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Ethics-of-Civil-Disobedience-FKJZX8UYVJ
https://www.ethicssage.com/2012/09/the-role-of-ethics-in-religion.html
https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/deontology