Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

The Connectors Industry

The Connectors Market

The Connectors Market

Timeline

Timeline

The Connector Market

Global Market grew 12% while China market grew more than 20%

Increased use of of electronicd components

Consolidation, mergers and transfor operations reduce the number of establishment to less then 300

2004

1980

1990 - 2005

The industry employed 22.492 people

- 16.473 production workers

2005

2006

1940

1980-1990

Bian Capital a Prive Investment fund

Beginnig of the electronic connector industry

The connector industry became overcrowded - 800 manufactures worldwide

Top Competitors

Top Competitors

  • Tyco Internatianl Ltd. with headquaters in Princeton, New Jeysey
  • Sales: $20.2 billion
  • Approx: 113.000 employees
  • Molex Inc. of Lisle
  • Sales: $ 3.33 billion
  • Approx: 32.160 employees
  • Thomas & Betts Corp. if Menphis Tennessee
  • Sales: $2.47 billion
  • Approx: 10.000 employees
  • FCI
  • Sales: 1.28$ billion
  • Approx: 14.000 employees

FCI

Lean Manufacturing - The Global Challange

Becoming a Global Player

Becoming a Global Player

  • FCI was founded in 1988 in Pennsylvania by Framatome, a nuclear engineering firm that build nuclear power plants.

  • Over the years, FCI increased their international presence through external growth, by acquiring almost 20 companies in 20 years.

  • This made them the largest connector manufacturers for carios electronis.

  • In November 2005, FCI was acquired by Bain Capital, a private investment fund which focued on acquiring industrial and techonolgy companies worldwide.

  • FCI operated in Asia, North and South America, and Europe.

  • FCI was a centralized organization where most of the directors were French and were based in France, while the fastest growing market was in Asia, notably China

Pirre Vareille

  • As Bain Capital wanted a new CEO to devise and implement FCI's transformation for value creation, they hired Pirre Vareille.

  • Pirre Vareille was currently living in France.

  • When he was hired by Bain Capital/FCI, he knew nothing about the connectors industry or the companys history, but his career path from plant manager to CEO had taught him one key lesson:

"Never get too much information in advance nor focus on the past. Keep an element of surprise. Keep the focus on the mission to transform the company so that it can adapt the the future."

  • Durng his first two months as CEO, Pierre visited each of the 24 plants and R&D centers around the world. He came to the same conclusion after each plant visit: The connector market was changing.

  • Pierre learned that traditionally, the American and European major players had focused on innovation.

  • As connectors were commodity products, company differentiation and success came from innovation rather than operational capabilities. Hence, operational excellence was not veiwed as a key succes factor in the industry.

  • He also learned that new entrants were changing the market.

  • He concluded that FCI's structure lacked flexibility - the ability to face the upcoming challenges.

  • Pierre created a new vision for the company's future in march 2008, during a seminar in Singapore:

"Our goal is to become the benchmark in the industry in terms of market share gain, sales growth, profitability, and people empowerment"

  • Pirre decided that the best way to live out this new vision, was to implement lean manufacturing. Pirre believed that Yves Merel was the man to get it done.

The First 100 Days

  • Pierre was a firm believer in the notion that if something did not get done within the first 100 days, it would never get done.
  • He therefore set clear priorities for his first 100 days
  • Customer Focus - emphasized quality and customer satisfaction
  • Supplier Development - Training supplier to FCI's standards

A Strategic Plan

  • Lean Manufacturing - Strategic objectives within operations
  • The strategic plan that should cover the next four years was presented to the shareholders in July 2008.
  • Designed to promote long-term value within the company
  • Based on five key cross-functional and mutually-reinforcing initiatives, led by the corporate headquarters, with its own visual identity and target.

A Strategic Plan

  • Lean Development - Boost engineering efficiency
  • People Empowerment - Highly skilled people for implemtation

Organizational Change

Organizational Change

  • Previously, the organization had been very centralized with no clear assessment of the profit and loss generated by the company's key divisions.
  • FCI's three Divisions were:
  • Micro Connections - Simcards, Banking cards and ID cards
  • Electronic - Intergrated different components together
  • Motorized Vehicles - Airbag and CD player

  • To achieve transparency, four business unites were created corresponding to the divisions, with the headquarter supporting them.

  • Pierre's decentralization initiative aimed to give more power to business units while reducing the size of the corporate office.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

  • During Pierre's visits to each plant, he discoverd that each site had its own reporting system, focusing on different indicators depending on the plants director experience and vision.

  • Pierre was convinced that to improve performance, a consistent set of KPI's were needed with a baseline and a clear target for each plant.

  • He communicated the KPI's and the target performace early in the process and never stopped reminding employees about them.

  • To enforce cultural change, two level of indicators were deployed:
  • First; Monitor the results
  • Second: Monitor the processes to acheive these results

  • Pierre further discovered that none of the sites monitored the number of accidents, which he believed was a clear indicator of how well the plants were managed.

  • He believed that by making this a high-priority topic, it would demonstate to employees, it's importance to the company.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

KPI After Implementing Lean

Lean Initiative

Lean Initiative

  • Yearly lean visits - Pierre organized yearly lean visits, which were to show his dedicated commitment to each site

  • Lean reviews, (Best practice Sharing) - He furthermore organized quarterly two-day meetings, which were conducted in every region
  • Daily routines - standard among FCI's plants

  • Kaizen workshops were organized and participants were relieved of all operational duties for three days to focus on achieving the following 3 objectives;
  • Workshop targets
  • Team Building
  • Creating a high level of energy within the group.

Lean Initiative

  • While this was the tip of the iceberg, the real infrastructure had already been put in place by Merel, who had put together a team of lean specialists to support the plant directors and the lean managers during their local deployments.

  • The team consisted of:
  • The Group Quality Director: A French Six Sigma Marster Black Belt, with a Specialty in Process stabilization and product quality improvement
  • The Former Lean Director: An American with specilty in process engineering and hoshin workshops
  • The Supply Chian Director: With a clear understanding of lfow improvement through the whole supply chain, from the suppliers to the customers, able to adapt the ERP to the Kanban usage.
  • Two German FIeld Senior Experts: (moulding and stamping) based in France and Korea with a specialty in maintenance management and TPM
  • A Former Plant Director: A Canadian based in Toronto with a specilaty in pull flow and lean management.
  • A Former Lean Manager: A Chinese based Dongguan-China plant with a specialty in SMED in the Asian plants.
  • A Lean Specialist: A Frenchman based in Singapore sepcializing in pull flow in the Asian plants.

Achievements by December 2010

Achievements by December 2010

  • In 2010, despite the economic situation, FCI maintained their strategic plan and the lean operational implementation.
  • Because of the continuous implementation efforts, lean was now recognized as part of FCI's culture by every employee around the world.
  • The lean implementation was a success because of the new vision, along with the buy-in from Bain capital and the implementation excellence of the teams. However, Pierre knew that there would still be many future challenges for the company.
  • Pierre stated:

" We can be satisfied by the job accomplished, especially knowing where we came from"

"But Yves, you and I both know that many challenges still lie ahead. The parameters of the equation we are trying to solve using lean are constantly changing"

  • The lean initiatives and Pierre's constant strive for perfection, led FCI's estimated market value to double.

Short about case B

Short about case B

  • Describes how the lean implementation effected a plant in China and what challenges they experienced, and furthermore, how the plant handled it.

  • The workers had a hard time understanding the need for the lean implementation, why they implemented a visual management board showing the corporate KIPs for each production line. To help the workers understand the need and impact of the lean implementation.

  • The corporate KPIs for each production line:
  • Safety
  • Quality
  • Productivity
  • Service level

  • Management routines for each work team, and they included:
  • Shop floor operators were 20-30% more present at the shop floor
  • Supervisors
  • Engineers

  • However, the stop-at-first-defect mindset was very difficult for people to adapt and hence difficult to implement.
  • As more workshops were organized on the shop floor, the staff developed a deeper understanding of lean.

  • The lean improvements were seen as a great step forward for everyone and it allowed productivity gains by eliminating obvious sources of waste.

Summary of identified Issues

Summary of identified Issues

1. Centralized Organization - based in France

2. Structure lacked of flexibility

3. Market changing

4. No Clear Assessments

5. Each plant;

  • Own Reporting System
  • Different KPI at each plant (the local workforce relied on the local director and his experience instead of an overall company vision)

6. Lack of Monitoring

7. Workers were resistant to change

8. Cultural barriers (Stop-at-first-Defect)

Recommendations for the Future

5S

SMED

Recommendations for the Future

Method that improve efficiency and effectiveness

Single minute exchange of die

Sort

Reducing production lot sizes

Simplifying

  • 5S

  • Kaizen - continuous improvement

  • SMED - Single minute exchange of die

Improving flow

Systematic cleaning

Reducing production loss

Standardize

Reducing output variability

Sustain

Recommendations for the Future

Question for you

Question for you

https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/N1IP7QPITE8ThrH

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi