Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
- Changing definition of nuclear power
- Victims of nuclear colonization deemed as not worthy of and not associated with nuclear technology, yet forced to deal with the consequences of nuclear postcolonialism
- murky line between nuclear violence/war/colonization and postcolonial consequences --> slow versus fast violence
https://bureauoflinguisticalreality.com/portfolio/teuchnikskreis/
Based on the Hecht reading and the editorial article, what is the relationship between the Global North and Global South in regards to nuclear energy?
Are there, if any, connections of this theme between this week’s readings and past ones?
- narrative of Western countries needing nuclear power to prevent themselves from being colonized
- narrative of countries freed from imperialism needing modernity + development to prevent future colonization
- narrative of keeping uranium "safe" through monopolization
Fission meant splitting atoms, and the resulting rupture in nature's very building blocks propelled claims to a corresponding rupture in historical space and time (6)”
atomic fantasies, nuclear nationalism v. nuclear apocalypse, self destruction
- nuclear as a part of Western "common sense"
- fear of nuclear power escaping from the "rational North"
Duck And Cover film (1950s)
https://www.history.com/news/duck-cover-drills-cold-war-arms-race
- Methods of control: US pledge system, advocacy for western European inspection exception, Indian narrative of regulations as colonial inequalities
- 1968 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons — 5 “nuclear weapons states” agreed to cooperate in the spread of nuclear technology among themselves but disarming all the other countries
yet nuclear tech as unalienable right for developing areas?
- Radiation protection as a health issue, not nuclear energy issue → mines not considered nuclear for regulation
- Difference between “first world” and “third world” safety standards
- Issues with establishing causality
- Standards for exposure are technopolical — “as low as reasonably achievable”
How do narratives of nuclear disasters shape who ends up shouldering the responsibilities of reparation?
What is obscured by conventional depictions of nuclear power, and what are its impacts on future solutions?
“US scientists fully expected adverse health effects to not only occur in the first generation of people exposed to fallout, but in the subsequent generations of people who live in a contaminated setting (6)”
“Short-term stability is prioritized over the long-term health of people and the environment on which they depend”
- 36 forms of radiogenic cancers and disease, and resulting immune system vulnerability
- High diabetes prevalence, high infant mortality, 15 year shorter life span compared to Americans
- Extinction of self-sufficient sustainable lifestyles
- Loss of traditionally held land + marine resources
- U.S. rejected validity of human rights review of nuclear weapon testing
- Cold War Period - gov't control over scientific findings to manage public fears, emphasis on nuclear militarism not being a threat
- Contradictions of official narratives were censored, authors blacklisted — confirmed by 1994 US Advisory Commission on Human Radiation Experiments
- Propaganda that radiation is natural, “trust us” narrative
Conclusion: need for citizen science
Based on the Mascoe reading and the movie trailer, how are past nuclear events contributing to changes in our biome today?
Is the featured quote an accurate summarization of the nuclear state? Why or why not?
Them! Film Clip
Main argument: We need a new conversation about the way wars kill- that include the “unseen human and environmental costs”
Recall from the reading the ways in which language is used to connotate different war strategies, specifically the use of nuclear weapons. How is it used to create an air of unaccountability for those deploying bombs and nuclear technology on foreign soil?
Realities of war: more complex than immediate killings from bomb detonation; renal failure, leukemia, birth defects, uranium in urine, carcinogenic environment
-warfare affects more than just the immediate temporal and environmental surroundings
- effects of war may not be visible immediately after, or ever
- "precision" implies swiftness with no lasting effects; in reality, these tactics have "indiscriminate effects"
"One man's precision guided missile is another man's weapon of indiscriminate destruction" characterizes relationship between victims and perpetrators of nuclear colonization
“Just as in Western nations toxic waste sites tend to be placed near poor or minority communities, so too unexploded ordinance pollution is concentrated in the world's most impoverished societies, Afghanistan, Cambodia, Laos, Somalia, Angola, Mozambique, Vietnam, Somalia, Nicaragua, El Salvador” pg 226
- outsourcing pollution
- unequal resource distribution
- targeting developing areas
Political Ecology: How do current political regimes advocate for "smart wars"? How does it perpetuate the exclusion of deleterious environmental effects?
"We need counter-narratives that locate the Highway of Death circa 1991 as not a scene of finality but an early moment in a far longer story of violence" pg 215
-U.S. hypocrisy - stringent domestic regulations vs. global ignorance and unconcern
-"military benefits are much larger compared to any health problems" pg 215
What marks the end of the war?
What is a casualty of war?
- "Smart war"- marketing of technologically advanced war strategies implies its lessened degree of harmfulness
-"Depleted Uranium" - to quell contestation to use of nuclear weapons
- "War" vs. "Operation" - different implied meanings
-“Fractal wars” -implies a disconnectedness and only virtual immediacy
-"Anti-personnel" bomb technology was ineffective in distinguish soldier from child; juxtaposed to "precision warfare" in which violent consequences muddled by death lag
"Wherever troops use cluster bombs and/or landmines, a tangle of economic, humanitarian, and environmental crises typically results. National reconstruction and the safe return of refugees are impeded; medical resources become overstretched; rural dwellers face a diabolical choice between abandoning their pastures or fields and risking death or mutilation; amidst a degraded environment, pressure on the land increases, fueling further rounds of conflict. These developments often lead to rapid deforestation and the slaughtering of wildlife.” pg 225
Interest in DU warfare caused by
- increased kill range; higher penetrative capacity
-extreme cheapness compared to other weapons technology; by product of nuclear testing
U.S. Department of Defense offloading waste (DU) for profit- "anti-environmental recycling"
DU half-life is 4.5 billion years; can enter food systems, soil, waterways (aquifers), carcinogenic environment ultimately affecting human bodies and cells for generations
Uranium replaces calcium in the body; causes tumors, alters DNA, crosses blood-brain-barrier
Gulf War Syndrome- the illnesses/side effects faced by veterans after exposure to neurotoxic chemicals, specifically Depleted Uranium
"D.U. fragments are both a significant cause of Gulf War syndrome and a hazard to civilians for an indefinite period of time" - Dr. Asaf Durakovic, retired U.S. Army colonel, former head of nuclear medicine at a veterans’ hospital