Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Alistair MacIntyre
Our work this semester begins and ends with stories and the way we tell them. Stories embed each tweet we write, each news brief we read, each song we hear.
Let's start with definitions.
Think self talk. When have you engaged in intrapersonal communication today?
Here's a Seinfeld example:
Interpersonal
That's face to face communication. We are going to talk about ....
Mass Communication
Mass Communication means a message
is shared with a whole bunch or "mass"
of people at once.
Media comes from the word "medium" or
"mediated." So, mass media is really talking
about the channels used to communicate through a lot of media .... television, newspapers, the Internet...
even this Prezi ....
Your text explains how these communication types work. All, however, require encoding and decoding.
The basic model of communication is the same whether you are talking about one or a bunch of people or through a medium.
Pay attention to your text descriptions about each part of the model
The American Council for the Blind is encouraging media producers to create audio descriptions for movies and TV shows. Lots of new programs are taking them up on the suggestion, particularly on Netflix.
Take a break and try this out: Watch part of a show or a movie using audio description. You can find the option on your TV or computer in the same corner box to click on closed captioning for subtitles. The goal here isn't about imagining being blind. Instead, ask: How is this story different with the description added? What changes?
Now there is a term you need to know: Media Ubiquity. It means media is everywhere all the time.
Get out pen and paper:
Really...get out pen and paper
Write down all the different types of
media you have used in the last 24 hours.
You will need this list at different times during
this Prezi and on your Discussion Board.
Yes, that's a tweet from Mount Everest
He got more than 12 million
views ... and counting.
Americans on average spend
up to 5 hours or 30 percent of
their day consuming media.
Teenagers average over 7 hours.
Goal for you in this class:
Textbook definition:
Understanding how the media operates, the roles it plays, how messages are created and delivered, and how audiences respond.
Fighting myth with knowledge
Remember the United States media business model is narrowcasting, or getting the right audience, not on broadcasting, which means getting the whole audience.
Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and the now defamed Bill O'Reilly all have claimed that they are an alternative to something they call mainstream media. In reality, Fox News has considerably more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined. The same is true for Rush Limbaugh and his liberal radio counterparts.
We'll also talk about corporate ownership next week. For now, know that corporate conglomerates do pose a threat to smaller voices in the marketplace. However, that doesn't mean there is a coordinated conspiracy.
So, when President Trump calls stories he doesn't like "fake news," what does that mean?
The Newseum in Washington, D.C., and Facebook came up with this chart to help separate real news or "share-worthy" information from other types of information available online.
Do you think the chart helps set criteria for real news? Or ....
Is Facebook a credible contributor since the company has admited Russian scammers loaded its system with fake news?
Take a look at the chart more closely and decide what you think is shareworthy. (A link is also available in the Unit One folder on Blackboard.)
Important term:
American mass communication took off a hundred years ago when radio stations wanted to advertise to biggest audience possible. For a long time, that's what media companies wanted ... big audiences.
In the last few decades, they discovered what will raise more revenue. They want the target audience, not everyone. So rather than mass communication, they want demassification.
Next term to know:
Narrowcast is why
Abercrombie and
Fitch asked Jersey
Shore's The
Situation to stop
wearing it's label.
He just didn't
represent the kind
of audience they
wanted to target.
With narrow audiences, we also
get homophily... that's like when birds
of a feather flock together. People with
similar interests tend to seek out the
same media. That makes it good for
advertisers but it also means media
consumers only see one viewpoint on
most ideas ... and seeing only one viewpoint
doesn't make you very media literate.
Get a soda/coffee/water/beverage of choice.
Let all this sink in.
... because no one would spend money on this if there wasn't some effect
Think about this: What was life like in the U.S. in 1938? Where did people live? How did they feel about technology? Where did they get their news? Broadcasting was just getting started. CBS was a large broadcasting company … but how did it broadcast? Not television yet. The Mercury Theater aired radio dramas produced by Orson Wells and John Houseman. The two decided to put on an adaptation of HG Wells’ War of the Worlds.
Listen to clips of the hour-long program and imagine how you might have reacted to a story about a Martian Invasion. In 1938, radio is your primary form of entertainment.
There was no real panic. How did the story of panicked listeners begin? Researchers today say, "Blame America’s newspapers. Radio had siphoned off advertising revenue from print during the Depression, badly damaging the newspaper industry. The papers seized the opportunity presented by Wells’ program to discredit radio as a source of news." Audience ratings showed only about 5,000 people heard the original broadcast. Yet, as War of the Worlds grew more infamous over the next two years, thousands more claimed to have heard it than possibly could have. These fake listeners told researchers of the day that they panicked over something that they never heard.
This new medium of radio was deemed scary. It was believed to be able to make people respond in ways beyond their control. That's how the Big, Powerful Media Effects Theory was born.
It no longer mattered what actually happened. People believed it happened, and that belief shaped their memory and perception. New technology became even scarier. Your readings talk about W.I. Thomas, who came up with the idea of symbolic interactionalism. People will take action based on their beliefs, even if those beliefs are not based on reality.
Sociologists and other researchers realized pretty quickly that there was no magic bullet or powerful media effects. Media consumers bring lots of factors into play in deciding what to believe or how to react.
Researcher Paul Lazarfeld had worked on the War of the Worlds' studies and thought the results were wrong. He came back with a new idea ... He and others set out to research how people planned to vote in the 1940 presidential election. They interviewed over 2,000 women and discovered something important. Some women kept up with news and developed opinions. Their friends turned to them for suggestions on who to vote for. This became known as the two-step flow.
Here's a British example of how two step flow works in social media now ...
This is one you need to know because it serves as a foundation for later theories.
He focused on the channel or medium part of Lasswell's model. What do you think of his argument?
Numerous researchers try to figure out exactly what kind of impact the media has on consumers and the consumers have on the media.
This theory argues people use media for specific reasons:
So what about you ... What do you use your favorite media for?
The media doesn't tell us what to think; it tells us what to think about. In other words, people tend to think topics are important if they get lots of news coverage and not if those topics don't. The theory: Consumers will form their own ideas as to why something is right or wrong, but the importance of the idea gets saliance (meaning significance in our eyes) if there are a lot of news stories.
This theory came out when legacy media (newspapers and nightly TV news) controlled news spread. Agenda setting is even more important now that consumers can talk back through social media. Something that generates lots of Twitter response is going to be on the public agenda. Your text talks about the #WheresRey outrage when the one new female Star Wars character didn't get her own action figure. Check out what came out on May 4 Star Wars Day in anticipation of the new movie.
Think about your own social media feed. Has the way you express opinions changed? Have you not posted something or limited the audience because of how others might react?
Socrates is credited with
coming up with the idea of
catharsis... Watching violence
releases tension and makes you
less likely to become violent for
real. He said that is why people
watched Greek Drama and the
Olympic Games.
Largely discredited because it is a Magic Bullet Theory. Assumes people see violence and act on it.
Early Bobo Doll studies found that kids watching violent cartoons would become more violent in play.
However, there are lots of examples of serial killers emersing themselves in violent movies and games. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold watched the Basketball Diaries and played Doom again and again in the days leading up to the Columbine Massacre, the largest high school mass shooting to date. They modeled their costumes and moves from these two media. Considering that these media images are two decades old, what do you think about the aggressive stimulation? Watch just a few minutes of Doom and the full Basketball Diaries clip.
But lots and lots of people watch violent video games and they don't become mass murderers. Research backs that up. Social learning theory researchers also document that watching lots and lots of media violence does desensitize people to real violence, especially for kids.
Entertainment violence can lead to increases in aggressive attitudes, values and behavior, particularly in children.
American Medical Association,
American Psychiatric Association,
American Academic of Pediatrics
Repeated social learning research shows men who were high TV-violence viewers as children were significantly more likely to have pushed, grabbed or shoved their spouses, to have responded to an insult by shoving a person, and were three times more likely to have been convicted of a crime than other men.
Women who were high TV-violence viewers as children were more likely to have thrown something at their spouses, to have responded to someone who made them mad by shoving, punching, beating or choking the person, to have committed some type of criminal act. Such women, for example, reported having punched, beaten or choked another adult at over four times the rate of other women.
These findings hold true for any child from any family, regardless of the child's initial aggression levels, their intellectual capabilities, their social status as measured by their parents' education or occupation, their parents' aggressiveness, or the mother's and father's parenting style.
However, research also shows parents can play important roles to limit the negative effects. Parents watching TV with their kids means kids are less likely to:
Take a look back through the Media Effects on Violence section of this Prezi and get started on your Discussion Board.
You've done well so far.