Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

WAVE ENERGY CONVERTER (WEC)

Designing 1KW Generator

Types of WEC

Type of WEC

Over-topping

Device

Oscillating

Water Column

Oscillating Water Column

Wave Activated Bodies

Wave Activated

Bodies

It is an advanced technology and is really good to convert the wave up and down motion to electrical energy

Design Topology

Design

Topology

Slotted / Slotless

  • Reduce cogging Torque

  • Allow smoother performance

Slotless / Slotted

Air-core Stator / Iron-cored Stator

Higher magnetic field

Air-core Stator /

Iron-cored Stator

-Has higher magnetic field

-Iron can help to dissipate the heat

Moving Coil / Moving magnet

-Rotor is moving up and down. Therefore can attach magnet to rotor.

-For moving coil need space for the coil to move

Moving Coil /

Moving Magnet

Radial / Axial / Halbach

Axial /

Radial /

Halbach

-Radial is simple to design and cheaper

-Halbach is complicated and more expensive

-if cost is a concern, we choose radial.

-if efficiency and size is a concern, choose Halbach

Rotary / Linear

Rotary / Linear

  • The wave move up and down
  • Therefore is suitable to be used for linear generator which moves up and down.
  • Linear generator also more advanced than rotary generator

Planar / Tubular

Planar / Tubular

-Planar require longer coil and

more iron required

-Greater coil losses, and iron losses

-tubular have denser magnetic flux and flux is distributed evenly.

Induction Generator /

Synchronous Generator /

Permanent magnet Generator

  • Doesn't require external DC source
  • Can use strong magnet to create a strong magnetic field

Induction Generator /

Permanent magnet Generator / Synchronous Generator

Generator

Design

Dimension

Design A

Design B

Design C

Flux Lines

Design Output

Generator output

Specification

Flux Line vs axial position

Induced Voltage and Flux Linkage

Motion Up

Motion Down

Air gap Flux Line

Design Process Flow

Conclusion

Conclusion

-During motion up, maximum voltage produce is 1.0221kV

-During motion down, the maximum voltage produce is -1.02456kV

-Stranded loss will increase if Ls/Lr is decrease

-Solid Loss will increase if Ls/Lr is increase

-Total copper loss for the proposed design is 34.8737W.

-We can reduce this losses by designing the Ls/Lr=0.6 which has total copper loss of 34.1692W.

-The proposed design has an efficiency of 96.63%.

-This can also be optimized by using Ls/Lr=0.6 where the efficiency is 96.93%

-Radial and halbach have its pros and cons.Both design is able to achieved 1kW.

-Customer that focus on cost will eventually choose radial

-However, customer that focus on size, efficiency and advanced technology will choose halbach

Optimization

Ls/Lr 0.2 design

Induced Voltage

Solid Loss

Stranded loss

Ls/Lr 0.4 design

Induced Voltage

Solid Loss

Stranded loss

Ls/Lr 0.6 design

Induced Voltage

Stranded Loss

Solid loss

Efficiency

Ls/Lr 0.8 design

Induced Voltage

Stranded Loss

Solid loss

Ls/Lr 1.0 design

Induced Voltage

Stranded Loss

Solid loss

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi