Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
The conceptions of curriculum embody distinct beliefs about the type of knowledge that should be taught in schools, the inherent nature of children, what school learning consists of, how teachers should instruct children and how children should be assessed (Schiro, 2013)
Curricular theorists have identified different curricular approaches which they have classified into different conceptions. (Al-Mousa, 2013)
It is hard to predict exactly what curriculum ideology will become mainstream in the future. My belief is that this is due to the ever changing society we live in. As demonstrated in the past, different ideologies and approaches are based on past experiences and our views of society. Predicting exactly what approaches will continue is unlikely due to the inability to see into the future.
There are a number of Curriculum ideologies based on different Curriculum Theorists. The majority of these ideologies overlap and can be organized into four different general categories: Individual, Society, Technology and Academia.
The specific ideology based on the Curriculum Theorist can be found within the category.
Different Curriculum Theorists have come up with different names for this theory such as:
Self-actualization (Eisner and Vallance)
Critical-exploratory (Marsh and Willis),
Humanistic (McNeil),
Individual fulfillment (Pratt), and
Personal Success and commitment (Vallance)
Regardless of the term, the overall Ideology is that the student's background combined with the academic content, create unique learning experiences. The teacher provides warmth and nurtures emotions while continuing to function as a resource and facilitator (McNeil, 2009).
Individual Curriculum Ideologies promote learner autonomy and aesthetic and moral qualities in learners (Al-Mousa, 2013). With an emphasis on student-centeredness, Individual Ideologies incorporate content and societal-cultural needs to assist individuals development (Eisner & Vallance, 29174).
As a Learning Assistance Teacher, I work with students who have fallen behind grade level in reading. Following an Individual Conception of Curriculum Ideology, the following are some strategies I would use to build my framework to improve student reading to meet grade level expectations:
Different curriculum theorists have come up with different names for this theory such as:
Regardless of the term, the overall ideology among the terms is creating social change (Eisner & Vallance).
This theory is conscious of societies problems and injustices done to society's members. The teacher's job is to facilitate the construction of a new and more just society. The student's job is to use curriculum to be able to develop a vision of a better society and act to bring it to existence.
Following a Societal Conception of Curriculum Ideology, the following are some strategies I would use to build my framework to improve student reading:
Different curriculum theorists have come up with different names for this theory such as:
This ideology focuses mainly on the how rather than the what of Education (Eisner & Vallance, 2974; Sowell, 2005).
This approach is very learner centered and focuses on the needs and concerns of the individual. A curriculum grounded in this conceptions aims to give the learner intellectual autonomy to be able to select and interpret situations outside of the school context (Al-Mousa, 2013).
Following a Technology Conception of Curriculum Ideology, the following are some strategies I would use to build my framework for improving student reading to grade level expectations:
Different curriculum theorists have come up with different names for this theory such as:
The overall approach is to help students learn knowledge of our cultures. The teacher's job is to introduce disciplines to the students, and the student's job is to learn the information. The curriculum is knowledge for use (McNeil, 2009).
Eisner and Vallance's belief is that this 'traditional-bound' idea remains and seems likely to endure (Eisner and Vallance, 1974).
Following an Academia Conception of Curriculum Ideology, the following are some strategies I would use to build my framework for improving student reading to grade level expectations:
Conceptions of Curriculum is a very diverse and ever changing topic.
General ideologies such as Individual, Society, Technology and Academia have many different theories within them that Curriculum Theorists have labeled. These labels and definitions were created based on the theorist's set of beliefs, background, data or environment.
Over the years the focus of an educator's ideology may change, depending on the events and needs of society and individuals.
Al-Mousa, N., (2013). An Examination of CAD use in two interior design programs
from the perspectives of curriculum and Instructors. Kingston, Ontario:
Al-Mousa, N.
Eisner, E., Vallance, E. (1974). Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum. Berkeley,
California: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Hunkins, F., Ornstein, A., (2013). Curriculum, Foundations, Principles, and Issues.
New Jersey, USA: Pearson.
McNeil, J., (2009). Contemporary Curriculum, In Thoughts and Action. Las Angeles
California: John Wiley & Sons
Schiro, M., (2013). Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Curriculum Theory.
Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications
Sowell, E., (2005). Curriculum, An Integrative Introduction. Upper Saddle River,
New Jersey: Pearson