Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Response to Invervention (RTI) is a structured research-based instruction method to assist struggling learners (Lawrence 2012).
(RTI Network 2017)
Early intervention to avoid long time failure. (Lawrence 2012).
McGrawHill Education (2017)
Tiers are divided into three parts:
Tier 1 - On Level or Above
Tier 2 - Lagging need intervention.
Tier 3 - Lag behind 1 or more years.
Elevate students in areas of struggle.
Students that are struggling academically are put into tiers that intervene before the student falls too behind.
Jaeger (2016)
Competitor
Our Company
Jaeger's Study:
2017/3
2017/2
2017/1
Jaegar (2017) Study:
St. Croix River district student percentage of students reaching benchmark target scores has increased significantly over the past decade from 35% to 70% (Gibbons 2016).
In the Chicago Lakes School District 2144 in Lindstrom, Minn., the percentage of 2nd grade students reaching benchmark target scores has increased from 38% to 82% over the past decade (Gibbons 2016).
All students are included!!!!
Focus on strategies that are based on needs and standards.
Teachers are able to select the type, amount, and instensity of instruction.
Time
Lack of Teacher Knowledge/PD
Lack of Differentiation
Work with grade-level teams to:
Winter 2016
Study: RTI Falls Short of Promise (Sparks 2015)
Tier 1 - 15 minutes 3 to 5 days a week.
Tier 2 - 30 minutes 3 to 5 days a week.
Tier 3 - 30 minutes 5 days a week.
Relationship Between Ongoing Professional Development and Educators' Perceieved Skills Relative to RTI (Castillo et.al 2016)
"Sadly... Classroom teachers lack the knowledge and skills to effectively differentiate instruction and curriculum to meet the needs of gifted learners."
Step 1: Identify your students needs.
Step 2: Review data (observations, test scores, performance, struggles, etc.)
Step 3: Identify which tier students fall in.
Step 4: Find research-based intruction appropriate for each tier.
Step 5: Progress monitor (data, benchmark assessments, formative)
Bianco, M. (2010). Strength-Based RTI: Conceptualizing a Multi-Tiered System for Developing Gifted Potential. Theory Into Practice, 49(4), 323-330. doi:10.1080/00405841.2010.510763
Castillo, J. M., March, A. L., Tan, S. Y., Stockslager, K. M., Brundage, A., M ccullough, M., & Sabnis, S. (2016). Relationships between ongoing professional development and educators' percieved skills relative to RTI. Psychology In The Schools, 53(9), 893-910. doi:10.1002/pits.21954
Gibbons, K (2016) Evaluating RTI’s Effectiveness Over the Long Term. AASA The School Superintendends Association. http://www.aasa.org/SchoolAdministratorArticle.aspx?id=4894
Jaeger, E. L. (2016). Intensity of Focus, Richness of Content: Crafting Tier 2 Response to Intervention in an Era of the Common Core. Reading Teacher, Sep/Oct2016, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p179-188, 10p, 2 Charts
Lawrence, C. (2012). The RTI Startup Guide : Tools and Templates for Schoolwide Implementation. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin.
McGraw-Hill (2017) Response to Intervention (RTI), McGrawHill Education. Imaged accessed from https://www.aleks.com/k12/RtI-Tiers-v3.hcache:20140815.jpg.
RTI Network (2008) What is RTI? RTI Action Network. Accessed at http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/what/whatisrti
Sparks, Sarah D (2015) Study: RTI Practice Falls Short of Promise. Education Week. Vol. 35, Issue 12, Pages 1, 12
Winter, Renee (2015). The Benefits of Response to Intervention (RTI). Teaching in Purple. Accessed at: http://blogs.gcu.edu/college-of-education/the-benefits-of-response-to-intervention-rti/