Loading…
Transcript

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages

What is the CEFR?

A transparent, coherent and complete reference instrument

The result of more than twenty years of research, the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, evaluation (CEFR) is exactly what its title says it is: a frame of reference. It was designed to provide a transparent, coherent and comprehensive basis for the development of curricula, the design of teaching and learning materials, and the assessment of foreign language proficiency. It is used in Europe but also in other continents.

The CEFR is available in 40 languages.

Model

Model

The CEFR model is based on competencies, which are expressed in the form of descriptors by level. They include information about activities, language, conditions, limits, topics, processes and strategies that the user manages at each level. It has a positive approach, that is, it focuses on what the user can do.

A2 Global Scale

Examples

  • Can understand frequently used phrases and expressions related to areas of interest that are especially relevant (basic information about himself and his family, shopping, places of interest, occupations, etc.)

  • Can communicate when carrying out simple and daily tasks that do not require more than simple and direct exchanges of information on issues that are well-known or common.

  • Can describe in simple terms aspects of his past and his surroundings as well as issues related to his immediate needs.

The CEFR does not intend to contain all the possible competencies required in all the contexts in which language is used. In fact, the documents in the toolkit state that descriptors are merely illustrative and users of the framework must decide which ones are relevant to their context and adapt them to particular purposes. The CEFR is not:

  • exhaustive
  • preceptive
  • a definition
  • a curriculum
  • a checklist
  • an evaluation

What is it not?

CEFR Toolkit

After the final version of the CEFR appeared in 2001, the Language Policy Division encouraged the development of additional resources to support the appropriate uses of the CEFR in different learning, teaching and evaluation contexts. These resources are known as the "tool kit" of the CEFR.

Manual for Testing

  • Validity: What we state is true.

  • Reliability: There is consistency in the results.

  • Ethics and equity: There is awareness of the impact that the results have and provides the same opportunity to all those evaluated.

  • Planning

Considerations

Rating

“We will use the terms rating and raters here to refer to the action of evaluating in which the exercise of trained judgment is necessary, to a much greater degree than when it is performed more administratively. When judgment is used, the exam provider cannot clearly prescribe a single "correct answer" before assessing. For this reason, there is a greater margin for disagreement between judgments than in other types of evaluation and, therefore, a greater danger of inconsistency, among evaluators or in the work of an individual evaluator. A combination of training, monitoring and corrective feedback can be used to ensure that the rating is accurate and reliable."

Manual for the development of language exams and tests (For use with the CEFR)

Produced by ALTE on behalf of the Language Policy Division, Council of Europe

LSP

Language for Specific Purposes

LSP (Language for Specific Purposes) or language for specific purposes, is an approach to teaching, learning and evaluating languages that focuses on the particular needs of language users in contexts such as work or school.

https://www.occupationalenglishtest.org/

Recommendations

  • Establish an obvious need for the test together with the main stakeholders and make it clear that the test will primarily address language needs within a specific domain.
  • Data collection: depending on the domain, it is probably necessary to observe, interview, collect evidence, etc.
  • During data collection, sufficient reference materials and resources must be obtained.
  • Provide clear specifications, which include functional needs analysis.
  • Identify the central tasks, vocabulary, functions and grammar for the test.
  • Relate (or not) the test with the CEFR or other external framework or standard, depending on the context.
  • Find and involve experts in appropriate topics and contexts to work in collaboration with the entire test development process.
  • Establish an effective dialogue with the stakeholders at each stage.

C2 1,000 - 1,200 hrs

C1 700 - 800 hrs

Proficient

User

CEFR

Levels

Independent User

Levels

B2 500 - 600 hrs

B1 350 - 400 hrs

A2 180 - 200 hrs

A1

Basic User

C2

  • Can understand with ease virtually everything heard or read.
  • Can summarise information from different spoken and written sources, reconstructing arguments and accounts in a coherent presentation.
  • Can express him/herself spontaneously, very fluently and precisely, differentiating finer shades of meaning even in more complex situations.

C1

  • Can understand a wide range of demanding, longer texts, and recognise implicit meaning.
  • Can express him/herself fluently and spontaneously without much obvious searching for expressions.
  • Can use language flexibly and effectively for social, academic and professional purposes.
  • Can produce clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled use of organisational patterns, connectors and cohesive devices.

B2

  • Can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and abstract topics, including technical discussions in his/her field of specialisation.
  • Can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain for either party.
  • Can produce clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects and explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options.

B1

  • Can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, leisure, etc.
  • Can deal with most situations likely to arise whilst travelling in an area where the language is spoken.
  • Can produce simple connected text on topics, which are familiar, or of personal interest.
  • Can describe experiences and events, dreams, hopes & ambitions and briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and plans.

A2

  • Can understand sentences and frequently used expressions related to areas of most immediate relevance (e.g. very basic personal and family information, shopping, local geography, employment).
  • Can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on familiar and routine matters.
  • Can describe in simple terms aspects of his/her background, immediate environment and matters in areas of immediate need.

A1

  • Can understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at the satisfaction of needs of a concrete type.
  • Can introduce him/herself and others and can ask and answer questions about personal details such as where he/she lives, people he/she knows and things he/she has.
  • Can interact in a simple way provided the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help.

What competencies are important?

Evaluations

Once established that an evaluation is necessary, the next step is to determine what competencies are the ones we look for and what level of performance will do. Then, we need to design the tasks that will help is discover if candidates have those competencies.

Spelling and numbers

Descriptor

Task

Spelling and numbers

Read out loud the following information to your examiner. You can repeat it up to three times.

The new sales representative is Hyacinth Rossier. That’s H-Y-A-C-I-N-T-H, and then Rossier, R-O-S-S-I-E-R. Her phone number is 989 3468 5192 and her email address is h.rossier_28901@bigbank.com.us.

  • Can read information aloud in a fluent way, correctly spelling names, addresses or email addresses to clarify.
  • Can read different kinds of numbers (phone or card numbers, dates, prices, etc.) accurately.

Interview

Descriptor

Task

Interview

  • Can do an effective, fluent interview, deviating spontaneously from prepared questions, following up and searching for interesting replies.

  • Can take initiatives in an interview, expand and develop ideas with little help or prompting from an interviewer.

Conduct a 4-5 minute interview using the following questions:

Customer Service

• What skills are necessary to work in customer service?

• How does bad customer service affect a company?

• Tell me about 3 things that annoy you as a customer.

• What can companies do to avoid annoying customers?

• In your opinion, is the customer always right? Why (not)?

• How should companies deal with complaints.

Sustained Monologue

Putting a case

Descriptor

Task

Sustained Monologue

  • Can develop a clear argument, expanding and supporting his/her points of view at some length with subsidiary and relevant examples.
  • Can construct a chain of reasoned argument.
  • Can explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options.

You must convincingly ‘pitch’ an idea, concept, product/service or proposal in one minute, so this is a timed exercise. I’ll give you one minute to think about what you’re going to say. These are some ideas you can use:

• A product or service you are offering

• An idea for a website/social network

• A special project you need to fund

• A favor you need from someone

• A party plan for a birthday/wedding

• An idea for a blog or a book

Goal-oriented cooperation

Descriptors

Task

The company you work for is going to send one employee to an English-speaking country for one month on a sales trip. Talk together for about 2 minutes about three of the employees and decide which one would be the best.

Goal-oriented cooperation

  • Can help along the progress of the work by inviting others to join in, say what they think etc.
  • Can outline an issue or a problem clearly, speculating about causes or consequences, and weighing advantages and disadvantages of different approaches.

Case Study

The Gustave Conference Centre

MEETING ROOMS

The Conference Centre has three meeting rooms and four seminar rooms.

The meeting rooms

Rossini

• Seating capacity: 100

• Video-conferencing, large screen (5m X 4m), no direct access to the terrace and garden, technical support at all times.

Puccini

• Seating capacity: 75

• Video-conferencing, large screen (4.5m X 4m), and direct access to the terrace and garden.

Verdi

• Seating capacity: 50

• Film projector and screen (4m X 3.5m), six laptops ($20 a day), technical support at all times.

The Gustav Conference Centre is just outside the city center of Vienna, Austria. Three companies want to stay at the conference center during the period Friday July 7th to Sunday July 9th.

Read the information about the companies and their needs. Then read the information on the Conference Centre’s meeting rooms.

NOTES

  • Minnesota Chemicals is a large international company. It is a new customer for the Conference Centre.
  • Elegant Ways Beauty Products and JooC Designs had conferences at the Centre last year.

OTHER REQUIREMENTS

  • Minnesota Chemicals wants: video-conferencing; projector + large screen (5m X 4m), direct access to the terrace and garden.
  • Elegant Ways Beauty Products wants: video-conferencing; projector + large screen (5m X 4m), direct access to the terrace and garden, technical support.
  • JooC Designs wants: large screen (5m X 4m), 10 laptops, and technical support.

Formal Discussion

Descriptors

Tasks

Role play

Call Minnesota Chemicals or JooC Designs, explain availability of rooms and services and make them an offer. Use appropriate language, be polite and handle objections professionally.

Formal Discussion

  • Can participate actively in a routine and non routine formal discussion.
  • Can follow the discussion on matters related to his/her field, understand in detail the points given prominence by the speaker.
  • Can contribute, account for and sustain his/her opinion, evaluate alternative proposals and make and respond to hypotheses.

Overall Listening Comprehension

Descriptors

Task

Overall

Listening

Comprehension

1. What is the woman’s main purpose in calling?

A.To arrange for the car to be picked up.

B. To tell the man the price for the work.

C. To get the man’s credit card number.

D. To tell the man when the work will be finished.

2. Who worked on the car?

A. A helper

B. Ron

C. Gerry

D. Jesse

3. What is the maximum that will be charged to the man’s credit card?

A. $150.00

B. $170.00

C. $180.00

D. $200.00

  • Can understand the main ideas of propositionally and linguistically complex speech on both concrete and abstract topics delivered in a standard dialect, including technical discussions in his/her field of specialisation.
  • Can follow extended speech and complex lines of argument provided the topic is reasonably familiar, and the direction of the talk is sign-posted by explicit markers.

Conclusion

  • The CEFR is a useful reference to develop and design tests but it has to be adapted to the purposes of the tester.
  • In order to have a valid, reliable and ethical test, it is necessary to establish the profile of the raters and standardize the exam.
  • The exam must provide the necessary tasks to find out whether the candidate has the competencies our client is looking for.

Conclusion