Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
There are many types of catastrophes that occur everyday. Let's name a few!
Avalanches, earthquakes, floods, forest fires......etc
Crime, war, terrorism, threats,, mass murder events..... etc
The purpose of an argumentative essay is to organize and present a well-reasoned ideas and conclusions in order to persuade and pull the readers into accepting and considering your point of view.
a. Hook: an opening statement in an essay that attempts to grab the reader's attention so that they want to read on.
b. Background information about the topic.
c. Thesis Statement: it tells the reader how you will present the significance of the subject matter under discussion
a. Present the first point and supporting evidence
B. Add proof to the point you've presented with an outside reference.
a. Present the first piond and supporting evidance
B. Add proof to the point you've presented with an outside referance.
a. Restate thesis statement
b. Briefly review 3 main points..
c. Leave the reader with an interesting thought about your argument. Remember: You want them to believe you!
- Pick a topic that you actually believe in. Can't convice people if you're not convinced yourself!
- Start with context about your argument and add detailed evidences and supporting ideas.
- Use valid sources to back up your arggument.
- Use linking words. It makes it more appealing and easily understandable.
- Don't push an argument that you don't support.
- Don;t worry about forcefully changing someone's mind. Pushing it can only result in a backfire result!
Nancy Sherman (born 1951) is a distinguished university professor and professor of philosophy at Georgetown University. She was also the first Distinguished Chair in Ethics at the United States Naval Academy. Sherman is the author of several books.
Nancy Sherman always wanted to understand more what her father went through as solider in the world war II.
Traumatic events take a toll on the physical and mental well-being of the individuals who must endure them. Survivors of the Holocaust, rescue workers, and war veterans, for example, might wonder how they were able to make it out alive when others did not. The term “survivor guilt” is used to describe these feelings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEyK4IPb02M&ab_channel=GiftFromWithin-PTSDResources
Let's discuss the elements of the topic in hand
Coping with guilt.
“The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt,” talks about how people that go through life and death situations feel when one of them dies. The others feel survivor guilt.
“The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt" explores the pros and cons of survivor guilt
Something that carried with difficulty or obligation
Synonym
anxiety, concern, difficulty, responsibility
Antonyms
advantage, benefit, assistance, aid
Guilt or blame that deserved ; blameworthiness
Synonym
accountability, guilt, fault, responsibility
Antonym
innocence
A person's moral sense of right and wrong, viewed as acting as a guide to one's behavior.
Synonym
shame, censor, duty, morals
Antonym
immorality
Deep sense of or regret for having done wrong.
Synonyms
guilt, grief, pity, shame
Antonyms
joy, happiness, satisfaction
Given the responsibility of doing something or caring for someone or something
Synonyms
assign, invest, trust, confide
Antonyms
deny, hold, keep, retain
Characterized b empathy the ability to identify with feelings or thoughts of others.
Synonyms
feeling, sympathetic, compassionate, sensitive
Antonyms
uncaring, ruthless, merciless, insensitive
Every year, thousands of innocent people blame themselves for a death they could do nothing about, often times making things much harder for them. That is called survivor guilt. Survivor guilt is feeling guilty about surviving a life and death situation when somebody else was either hurt or killed in the incident.
The writer starts by stating the fact that war survivors have different emotional realities and feelings even after returning home from war.
The writer addresses the feeling thoses soldiors feel after returning home. The guilt that feels like a burden, a responsibility.
The idea that if they could have done things differently, they resukts may have been better. Even though they were not at fault.
The writer refers to a story of Bonenberger who couldn't save the life of his lifesave 'Pulaski". Feeling the responsibility of his death because while his friend saved his life twice, he couldn't be there for him when he needed help.
The writer compares between subjective guilt and objective guilt in terms of definitions and rationality of thinking.
The writer refers to other philosophers ."Nietzsche and Spinoza and their theories about subjective guilt where one had done nothing wrong.
It's not about changing the attetude or the mistake.
The writer identifies the feelings that comes with survival guilt as being assossiated with moral significnace rather than moral actions. "Meaning it's more important who I am in person and character and not what I do that matters.
The writer also backs her argument by refering to Aristotle, who also believes that it's not the action that counts, but the emotions that are hidden behind it.
- What is survival guilt? Who feels it?
- Why does the writer focus on defining
what it is to be “good” in paragraph 6?
- Why did the writer refer to other philosephers at some point?
- In your opinion, how do people get over those feeling of subjective guilt?