Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
At the beginning of my placement, I was expected to ask my mentor (her/she) to assist me in identifying two focus children. With an instant reaction of laughter, my mentor responded:
“Oh this will be fun… Have fun with this one (Child A), I gave up on him last year, there is no hope left for him. If you can help him in anyway it would be a miracle, but I doubt you will”.
I was horrified by my mentor’s professionalism, including her attitudes and beliefs regarding Child A. She made me cry, I cried for that child when I drove home that day. I immediatley made the assumption that he is neglected in his immediate environment (Bronfenbrenner, 1997). I continued the conversation by asking for more information regarding the child’s development and learning interests. The following information was shared:
How do I support this neglected child's autonomy, safety and wellbeing in the classroom context?
For the first few days of placement, I made the decision to observe the interactions had between my mentor and Child A.
Check for enforceable legal factors including:
There are no legal requirements that state that the parent should be included in the meetings.
Refer to:
I know that core values, including work around EBP means that the mother should be involved in the decision making.
Draw on historically recognised principles such as:
I believe that having mum in on decision making will promote good for all as she is very aware of the whole class needing extra support through a transition.
Draws on philosophical positions such as:
My decision sits with care-based and ends based considerations. The care for human relationships and the result for the greatest good as mum is focused on making sure all students are successfully transitioned.
Draw on professional:
My experience tells me that for this to be a positive experience, all parties need to be involved in the decision making. I also called on the expertise of my Practice Leader and Cluster Manager to guide my decision making.
Make judgements that:
We will have a 'professionals' meeting that includes teacher, principal, deputy principal, RTLB and Practice Leader and then have another meeting with mum, teacher and RTLB to tweak and finalise the plan.
Take appropriate action:
Professionals Meeting: 8th May 2020 @ 8.30
(Very specific minutes taken and shared with all parties)
Whanau Meeting: 11th May 2020 @ 9.30
(Minutes taken and shared with all parties)
Implementation of the plan: 15th May 2020 @ 1.00
(Face to face with teacher, RTLB and TA)
Record and date detailed information about:
All documentation has been uploaded to Schoolgate and shared hard copies with school and whanau. Ongoing notes around implementation and review will be uploaded as needed.
Critically evaluate:
I believe that using the cycle to make my thinking visible was very beneficial. I was able to justify the judgement with others. In the end all parties were satisfied with the final plan. Moving forward I would like to have the opportunity to have the teacher, parent and myself in a meeting that addresses some of the issues that the teacher is experiencing with the student in the classroom. Overall, this has been a valuable experience that has refined my practice in working through ethical dilemmas.