Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Jacob Campbell - 30181463
1. Aims and Objectives
2. History of TCAS
3. Mid Air Collisions
4. Collision Avoidance System
5. Birth of TCAS
6. ACAS
7. TCAS II
8. Operating Principles
9. Surveillance
10. Transponders
11. Threat Detection and Display
12-13. Traffic Advisory (TA)
14-15. Threat Resolution - Resolution Advisory (RA)
16-17. TCAS II
18. Limitations
19. Fault Tree Analysis
20. How it works
21. Questions
22. References
Have an entry level understanding of:
1
1950s-1974
1978-1993
2003
Current
2
Mid air collisions involve two aircraft making physical contact with each other whilst in flight (Skybrary, 2019).
It is considered to be one of the most sudden and catastrophic accidents imaginable.
TU-154 and DHL 757 Collision over Überlingen 2002 (Fighter Jets World, 2019).
3
Dates back to the mid-1950s when a mid air collision happened between two U.S. air carrier aircraft over the Grand Canyon.
Different approaches were taken in making and using Avoidance Systems.
In 1974 the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) began focusing on the Beacon Collision Avoidance System (BCAS).
(Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
1956 Grand Canyon Disaster (Reimann, 2017).
4
A second mid air collision over San Diego 1978 between an Air Carrier and General-Aviation aircraft.
1981 BCAS name changed to Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
A third collision in 1986 near Cerritos lead Congress in 1987 to implement legislation requiring the FAA to have an airborne collision system at the end of 1992 (extended to 1993).
Applied to all turbine aircraft carrying over 30 passengers.
(Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
San Diego Flight 182 crash (Derner, 2015).
5
Impact zone of the 1986 Cerritos plane crash (Grobaty, 2016).
Changes to TCAS.
Resulting in 'Version 7' or Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS).
Began in 2003 and now is a mandate for aircraft with:
Equipped to over 25,000 aircraft world wide
(Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
Integrated TCAS Solution (Rockwell Collins).
6
Updates from 7.0 to 7.1 improving the safest option (Skybrary, 2019).
TCAS II (version 7.1)
Developed by 'EUROCONTROL' but was undertaken by both RTCA (Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics) and EUROCAE (European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment.
Commands to the pilot such as "Level off, level off" to avoid collisions.
(Skybrary, 2019)
Mandated by FAA for 30+ passengers or 33,000lbs.
(FAA, 2011)
Updates from 7.0 to 7.1 allowing for Reversal Logic (Skybrary, 2019).
7
(Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
8
Diagram showing an aircraft interrogating another (Romli).
'Surveillance' is the first line of action for TCAS.
No need for any ground inputs.
Antennae on the aircraft transmit a 1030MHz signal to interrogate other aircraft each second at closer ranges (5 seconds for longer).
Nearby aircraft picks up signal with transponder and replies with a 1090MHz signal.
Reliable range of 14nmi in traffic densities of up to 0.3 aircraft per nmi.
(Federal Aviation Administration, 2011)
Directional Transmission of an aircraft (Federal Aviation Administration, 2011).
9
Two types of transponders are used:
TCAS can track up to 30 transponders within 30nmi.
Mode S Surveillance.
Address known as ICAO 24-bit.
Used to find the range, bearing and altitude of the aircraft.
(Federal Aviation Administration, 2011)
Graph showing 'Whisper-Shout' Interrogation(Federal Aviation Administration, 2011).
10
Algorithms are used to decode the range, bearing and altitude signal.
Trajectory Extrapolation
Linear Extrapolation using current velocity
Gives a path that the aircraft is currently following
Threat Detection
Looks at the trajectory and compares with its current path
Tau - Time until the closest point between aircraft
Traffic Display
Display in cockpit shows nearby aircraft giving their:
And shows if they are climbing or descending by displaying an arrow.
'Non-threatening' aircraft further away show as hollow diamonds.
(Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
TCAS Traffic Display as shown in cockpit (Aerosavvy, 2015).
11
TA shown when collision point is within 3.3nmi or 40s.
Seen to be an intruder but not critical.
Shown on the TCAS display as an intruder directly from the threat detection process.
(Skybrary, 2019)
Intruder regions for TA and RA (Skybrary, 2019).
12
TCAS Traffic Display as shown in cockpit (Aerosavvy, 2015).
13
When within 2.1nmi or 25s from collision a TA becomes an RA
This is shown on the Display as a different icon
(Skybrary, 2019)
Intruder regions for TA and RA (Skybrary, 2019).
TCAS Traffic Display as shown in cockpit (Aerosavvy, 2015).
14
When RA criteria is met a threat-resolution algorithm decides what the pilot should do.
It generates this selection in two stages:
TCAS only recommends changing altitude as the bearing accuracy is not considered accurate enough.
A delay of 5 seconds is assumed.
Then a 0.25g of vertical acceleration before reaching 1500ft/min.
(Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
TCAS algorithm provides largest separation to the other aircraft (Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
15
TCAS algorithm deciding how fast it should maneuver (Kuchar and Drumm, 2007)
Due to some issues with TCAS some changes were made to simplify the system.
Updates from 7.0 to 7.1 improving the safest option (Skybrary, 2019).
16
Updates from 7.0 to 7.1 allowing for Reversal Logic (Skybrary, 2019).
Different advisories made by the TCAS II system (Skybrary, 2019).
These commands are played to the pilot in the cockpit through speakers to ensure they notice them.
The pilot is required to comply and if the A/C deviates from its ATC clearance the pilot is not responsible.
(Skybrary, 2019)
17
Cessna 182 (Pingstone, 2019).
Below 1,000 ft above ground level all RAs are inhibited. (Skybrary, 2007).
Often absent on smaller aircraft due to no legal requirement and costs of between $80,000/$200,000 and $50,000/$70,000 to install.
(Forecast International, 2007).
No horizontal seperation RAs are given in the current version (Kuchar and Drumm, 2007).
Terrain/ground conditions not taken into account.
Uses extrapolations instead of looking at actual aircraft routing from flight plans.
18
Fault tree (Air Traffic Organization, 2016)
19
Find the root cause or even human error for different systems.
Top level issue and then causes for that issue are looked at, all the way down to the root cause or low level component.
Faults are combined to calculate the reliability of the entire system.
They use symbols like these
Different event symbols (Belisario, 2019)
Different logic gates (Belisario, 2019)
20
Have an entry level understanding of:
21
References
22