Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
?
Dr. Dave Camlin, Sage Gateshead
dave.camlin@sagegateshead.com
"I'm a creep, I'm a weirdo,
What the hell am I doing here?
I don't belong here."
(Radiohead 1993)
In bringing together HE and cultural / creative sector in collaborative knowledge development partnerships, how do we avoid / resist advancing forms of cultural knowledge capital which simply reinforce the exclusive nature of our institutions?
‘The wealthiest, better educated and least ethnically diverse 8% of the population forms the most culturally active segment of all:
‘Everyone should enjoy the opportunities culture offers, no matter where they start in life.’
‘Much debate about inequalities is built upon a narrow definition of arts and culture, seeing it through hierarchies of taste or public funding and operating with what has been called a ‘deficit model’.’
‘We have created a culture in which ‘Art is what artists do,’ and that those without skill or talent in this area are discouraged from participating or practicing creativity. Those ‘non-creatives’ don’t feel sufficiently engaged in the rich cultural ecology of the UK. Arts and culture should be not just for everyone, but by, with and for everyone.’
What?
“What do we need to do differently to stimulate greater collaboration in knowledge development”?
Not just between the 8%, but with forms of knowledge that seem to exclude us, or which we feel aren’t 'legitimate'
How can we think differently about the development of cultural knowledge capital? e.g.
Rather than reinforcing the boundaries of our cultural knowledge ecologies, how might we make them more diffuse?
What is our ethical obligation to develop 'other' kinds of cultural knowledge capital? e.g. 'indigenous' knowledge? Dialogic knowledge? Distributed knowledge? Embodied knowledge? Interpersonal knowledge?
While politicians want to build walls, how can our partnership / collaborations contribute to a more equitable distribution of cultural knowledge capital?