Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
INTRODUCTORY BLOCK
`
OPERATIONAL BLOCK
Coordination frameworks for M&D
Vertical policy coherence in migration and development entails pursuing synergies between all levels of government to align work and goals to a common strategy for migration and development.
This means employing a multi-level coordination approach that ensures a common vision and goals at both national and local levels whereby:
For this, LRAs need to have human and financial resources as well as competencies and capacity building.
LRAs can feed their expertise and knowledge into national policy making for more responsive and pertinent national policies that can, in turn, be successfully implemented at the local level.
Let us look at two concrete examples of vertical policy incoherence:
Example 1:
National migration policy can also require cities to report any irregular migrants. Children whose’ parents are irregular migrants may therefore risk deportation by enrolling their children in school.
Example 2:
National labour migration laws may only allow for certain profiles for regular immigration e.g. nurses and agricultural workers yet at the local level in any given territory, the needs may be entirely different with territories needing more teachers or engineers and unable to acquire these within the country.
To be consulted when preparing national policies
To be heard:
local realities are very different even within one territories
To be supported when tasked with implementing national policies at the local level:
The objective was to enhance vertical policy coherence between national, regional and local actors in the regions of Bicol, Calabarzon and Western Visayas;
Through the establishment of regional and local committees on migration and development
These committees were able to achieve the following:
The presence of a lead entity is vital to ensure successful multi-level coordination
These must be institutionalised into the most relevant government structures
Providing human and financial resources is a must
Ensuring clear assignment of roles and responsibilities avoids overlap and ensures a smooth implementation process
Establishing committees on migration and development can strengthen efforts to mainstream migration into development planning that would affect the initiative (Philippines they were housed under overall Social Development Committees)
Moreover, they can strengthen horizontal coordination among the many actors involved in migration governance
Migration in the SDGs
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were announced in 2015 and sets the international development agenda until 2030. With the adoption of the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development, migration was formally recognized for the first time as a development topic. Integrating migration into SDG implementation is a key chance to integrate migration into development sectors over the next 15 years.
This also has two important precedents for migration governance:
Enables greater collaboration between different countries on migration
Enables greater collaboration between the migration and development sectors
What does this mean in practice?
National governments are seen as responsible for delivering and reporting on the SDGs in their countries, but local actors are also responsible for implementation. Local actors are also crucial for migration governance. Vertical coordination and coherence in migration-SDG efforts is therefore needed.
The migration-SDG linkages reach beyond implementing migration policies and entail integrating migration across sectors. Governments will need to be proactive to work horizontally across sectors to achieve their objectives. Therefore, the implementation of the SDGs requires cross-sectoral governance and coordination, and horizontal policy coherence throughout.
What are the different migration themes tackled in the SDGs?
Human trafficking and exploitation
Migration governance
Labour migration
Student mobility
Data on migration
Remittances
Which SDGs directly reference migration?
4.b Increasing student mobility
5.2 Eliminating trafficking of women and girls
5.4 Protecting migrant domestic workers
8.7 Combatting labour trafficking and forced labour
8.8 Promoting decent work and migrant labour rights
16.2 Combatting child trafficking
17.18 Increasing disaggregation of data by migration
10.7 Increasing safe, orderly and regular migration and improving migration governance.
10c. Lowering remittance costs
What about the indirect references to migration in the SDGs?
The 2o3o Agenda also contains targets that relate indirectly to migration. In these, migration is a cross-cutting theme and implementation of these should include migration.
Health
Education
Poverty & Growth
What about the indirect references to migration in the SDGs?
The 2o3o Agenda also contains targets that relate indirectly to migration. In these, migration is a cross-cutting theme and implementation of these should include migration.
Social Protection
Gender
Climate Change
Cities
In summary, it is possible to link almost every SDG target to migration. Migration can and should be integrated in as many of the targets as possible. This is the best way for migration to be mainstreamed effectively and sustainably across development sectors; the SDG framework offers us this opportunity.
Integrating migration will in turn help SDG implementation.
Now that we have looked at where migration figures within the 2030 Agenda, let us turn to how to mainstream migration within the Sustainable Development Goals, by examining the SDG implementation process in focus.
1. Kick off: Decide on institutional set up and start early awareness-raising
Ensuring policy coherence
Knowledge sharing
2. Prioritization : Identify migration priorities under SDGs and choose targets to focus on
Capacity-building (including for data)
Awareness raising
3. Monitoring and Reporting: Design indicators and set up reporting mechanisms for targets
4. Implement programs or projects
4. Implement policies and/or legislation
4. Mainstreaming Migration Interventions: Choose and design type of intervention
1. Kick off the SDG process:
2. Prioritization:
There is a wide range of SDG targets related to migration; these cannot all be tackled at the same time and not all are as relevant to each country.
This step involves selecting a number of SDG targets to address which are most relevant to the migration and development context.
4. Migration Interventions
Governments must take action towards their migration-SDG objectives. This could take any form, such as new policy frameworks, legislation, programming or projects. This step involves:
- Choosing interventions
- Mobilizing resources
- Design and planning
- Implementation and monitoring
- Capacity building
- Knowledge sharing
3. Monitoring and Reporting:
Stakeholders must capture, monitor, report, and analyze migration data on SDG targets. This step involves:
- Migration data mapping
- Developing indicators
- Reporting indicators
- Building data capacity
Migration data constraints in the context of SDGs are an immediate challenge but overall a long-term opportunity
Why is this step necessary?
There is a very wide range of SDG targets that are related to migration. These cannot all
be tackled at the same time and not all are as relevant to each country.
Each territory has a migration & development context that makes certain targets more
important than others to address. The aim, therefore, is to identify and prioritise
targets that relate to migration issues and objectives specific to each territory.
This exercise is crucial – it facilitates SDG progress in the migration issues that matter
most to territories.
SDG implementation is all about context – and this is where this starts.
How is it carried out?
This step can be taken through multi-stakeholder consultations. To ensure the
prioritisation exercise is successful, views of different stakeholders need to be
included.
These discussions should aim to:
• Identify and assess migration & development objectives in the context of the 2030
Agenda
• Choose a selection of SDG targets to focus on based on this
Discussions can begin either by considering first specific goals and targets from the
2030 Agenda, or by considering first the views of specific governance or
development sectors.
Applicability
Identifying migration topics and SDG targets that are of particular relevance to context.
Impact
Recognising where progress in a particular area holds a significant and necessary challenge for the territory, and where prioritisation would have a large impact.
Future Consideration
Taking a forward-thinking perspective to consider and address the territory’s possible migration
needs and scenarios over the next 15 years.
Constraint Recognition
Identifying and addressing any relevant constraints to topics, to realistically consider abilities to meet its migration & development goals.
Priority Linkages
Linking identified migration needs with priorities as identified by government and others, including any migration strategies of the territory, UN bodies, and others.
Why do this step?
All activities relating to migration and the SDGs need to tie back to the established follow-up and review processes of the 2030 Agenda, which underpin the whole process. Whether carrying out one small-scale SDG project or a whole-of-government migration mainstreaming exercise across ministries, need to develop indicators to monitor progress towards SDG targets. To monitor SDG progress at a global level, the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG) developed a list of 232 global indicators. Despite this, governments are required to develop their own indicators.
Why?
• Not all global indicators are appropriate for local or national use.
• Some do not allow for self-reporting. e.g. “Number of countries that have implemented well managed migration policies”.
• Many of the indicators that relate to migration are relatively under-developed.
• Most crucially, indicators allow for the SDGs to become context-specific
• Tailored indicators enable governments to monitor progress towards particular migration priorities that are not reflected in global indicators
• Global indicators do not capture migration dimensions in different sectors
A strong indicator and reporting framework for the SDGs is highly valuable, as it allows governments to take the SDGs into their own hands. It can also be a management tool to help develop migration & development strategies and plans.
How to do this step?
Governments create indicators for the targets they choose. If there is no overview of what relevant data is available for a target, governments should conduct a data mapping exercise, to gather information on relevant data capture and process for that target. Useful also because often the data is there and can be optimised; making the most of admin/statistical data.
Governments can choose how many indicators to create for each target depending on capacity and
resources; often each has between one and three.
Guiding principles for developing indicators:
Local/national indicator reporting mechanisms are needed that are systematic, transparent and which minimize the reporting burden.
Local and national reporting is a way to ensure greater accountability towards the 2030 Agenda. It is key also that regular ongoing reporting takes place at the local and national because countries are only asked to report at the global level twice before 2030.
At the local/national level, governments can publish indicators separately or integrate into national reporting platforms (NRPs) where these exist.
At the regional level, indicators should be integrated into any existing SDG reporting mechanisms.
At the global level, to the High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF) indicators can be integrated into Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs) where these are taking place.
Policy-makers need timely, reliable, accessible, and comparable data on international
migration to manage migration effectively.
Apart from improving data for chosen indicators, governments would benefit from considering ways in which migration data can be strengthened long term.
• There is a need for improved all development data as part of SDG implementation.
Meeting requirements of follow up and review mechanisms is difficult for most countries, especially those with low statistical capabilities.
– No data exist for two thirds of the 232 official internationally-set SDG indicators
• Further, global-level indicators relating to migration are under-developed; none of the
them are Tier 1 (i.e. they do not have established methodologies).
• Hence the need for governments to take it into their own hands to generate
meaningful reporting on migration & development in the context of the 2030 Agenda.
How?
What can we focus on?
Beyond the resource persons' own resources, the documents, papers and materials used for this course are listed here
GMG, 2010: Mainstreaming migration into development planning - A handbook for policy-makers and practitioners, available at: http://www.globalmigrationgroup.org/system/files/uploads/UNCT_Corner/theme7/mainstreamingmigration.pdf
IOM, 2011: Migration Profiles, Making The Most Of The Process. Available at: http://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/migrationprofileguide2012_1oct2012.pdf