Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Deportation Defense

In Appalachia

Arléne Amarante

Assistant Professor of Law

Lincoln Memorial University

Agenda & Overview

Agenda

Who is at risk for deportation (and why the rest of us should care).

What have we done to address this gap (and how you can help).

Legal Statuses

Undocumented

Lawfully Present

Lawful

Permanent Resident

Membership Levels

Citizen

Stage 2

Stage 1

Stage 3

Stage 4

Deportation Overview

Deportation

Process Overview

1. A potentially deportable individual is identified.

Potentially deportable person is ID'd

This can happen when...

ICE/CBP arrests an individual

Arrest by ICE/CBP

This can happen anywhere within the interior of the United States, including:

  • Courthouses
  • Bus stops
  • Traffic stops
  • Homes and workplaces

What about the Fourth Amendment?

Law enforcement notifies ICE

Local Law enforcement notifies ICE

The extent of local cooperation with ICE varies by jurisdiction.

Knox County has an active 287(g) agreement.

USCIS denies an application

USCIS denies an application

USCIS may notify ICE that an application will be or has been denied.

2. DHS determines appropriate procedure

DHS determines appropriate procedure

Whether and how removal proceedings are to be initiated depends on where the individual was apprehended and their immigration history.

Prior Removal Order

Prior removal order

Noncitizens who have previously been ordered removed may be deported at any time. Under certain circumstances, prior removal orders can be reopened and challenged.

Expedited Removal

Expedited Removal

Noncitizens encountered and arrested by Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) may be deported without seeing an immigration judge; this is known as an expedited removal.

Immigration

Court

Immigration Court Proceedings

Noncitizens within the interior of the United States are generally eligible to appear before an Immigration Judge and request relief from removal, including cancellation of removal and asylum.

The Notice to Appear (NTA)

3. Proceedings in Immigration Court

Court Hearings begin

Noncitizens who are issued an NTA are entitled to two kinds of hearings:

A Master Hearing is to determine prima facia eligibility for relief, find an attorney, and establish a timeline.

An Individual/Merits Hearing is a trial, where eligibility for relief is formally denied or established.

4. Deportation Logistics

ICE considers deportation logistics

If the receiving country accepts, ICE may immediately deport the noncitizen.

The noncitizen may be detained at this time or may be released under an Order of Supervision.

ICE may also grant a stay of removal. This is a temporary, discretionary relief noncitizens may request using ICE Form I-246.

Relief from

Removal

Relief from Removal

Most forms of relief from removal have two components:

(1) statutory eligibility; and (2) a favorable exercise of discretion

Cancellation

Cancellation of Removal

Eligibility criteria for non-LPRs:

  • 10 years of continuous physical presence. (Stop-time rule applies.)
  • Good Moral Character for ten years immediately preceding the date of the application.
  • No disqualifying criminal convictions (those in INA ss 212(a)(2),237(a)(2)-(3).
  • Removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to the alien's spouse, parent, or child, who is a USC or LPR.

Refugee, defined

INA 101(a)(42)

any person who is [1] outside [2] any country of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and [3] who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country because of [4] persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution [5] on account of [6] race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion …

Form I-589, Application for Asylum, Withholding of Removal and CAT

Asylum

Forms of relief for certain vulnerable populations

Forms of Relief for vulnerable populations

SIJS

Special Immigrant Juvenile (SIJ) Status

  • Must be under 21 at the time of the filing of the SIJ petition.
  • Must reside in the U.S. both at the time of the filing of the SIJ petition and the time USCIS adjudicates the petition.
  • Must be unmarried.
  • Must have a valid “juvenile court” order finding that:
  • Petitioner is dependent on court or is in custody of state agency or individual/entity appointed by the court;
  • Petitioner cannot be reunified with one or both parents because of abuse, abandonment, neglect, or a similar basis; AND
  • It is not in Petitioner’s best interests to return to country of origin or last residence.
  • Must have sought juvenile court order for intended purpose and not primarily to obtain an immigration benefit.

U Visa

U Visa Eligibility

  • Must be a victim of qualifying criminal activity.
  • Must suffer substantial physical or mental abuse as a result of having been a victim of criminal activity.
  • Must have information about the criminal activity.
  • Must show that petitioner was helpful, is helpful, or is likely to be helpful to law enforcement in the investigation or prosecution of the crime.
  • The crime must have occurred in the United States or violated U.S. laws.
  • Must show petitioner is admissible to the United States or is eligible for a waiver of inadmissibility.

Qualifications

  • Qualifying crimes include: rape, sexual assault, incest, domestic violence, felony assault, kidnapping, murder/manslaughter, prostitution, stalking
  • Children under the age of 16 or those unable to provide information due to a disability can have a parent, guardian, or next friend cooperate as to the crime on their behalf.
  • Requires U certification from law enforcement, prosecutor, or judge
  • Derivative status available for qualifying family members
  • If petitioner over 21, spouse and children
  • If petitioner under 21, spouse, children, parents and unmarried siblings under age 18
  • Cap of 10,000 per year (currently 4 years, soon to be 7)
  • May be placed on waitlist and get deferred action & EAD

T Visa

T Visa Eligibility

  • Victim of a “severe form of trafficking in persons”—defined to include two categories of labor: sex and labor
  • Sex trafficking: involves a coerced commercial sex act or person under 18 induced to perform a sex act
  • Labor trafficking: coerced labor or services for purpose of involuntary servitude or debt bondage
  • Physically present in the U.S. because of trafficking
  • Compliance with reasonable request for assistance from law enforcement agency
  • Exceptions: Petitioner is under the age of 18 or is unable to cooperate due to physical or psychological trauma
  • Extreme hardship involving unusual and severe harm if removed

  • Compliance requirement can be satisfied by T Cert (from LEA), but doesn’t have to be—you just have to prove it up!
  • Compliance requirement not applicable if under 18 or can show unable to meet due to trauma
  • Reasonableness of request determined based on totality of circumstances, including standard LE practices, nature of victimization, and victim’s specific circumstances (fear, trauma, age, maturity).
  • Hardship: factors include age; personal circumstances; physical/psychological consequences of trafficking; impact of loss of access to U.S. criminal justice system & civil redress; possibility of retaliation or revictimization if returned to home country
  • 5,000 cap (typically not met)
  • EAD, path to AOS

Prosecutorial Discretion

Prosecutorial Discretion

  • Selective prosecution (not a defense).
  • Deferring Enforcement
  • Deferred Action and Stays of Removal.
  • DACA has been the most ambitious exercise of prosecutorial discretion.

Dead

Meissner Memo 2000

Meissner Memo, 2000

Meissner Memo provided that INS officers may decline to prosecute a removal case if the federal immigration enforcement interest to be served by prosecution is not substantial. Facts included immigration history, length of U.S. residency, humanitarian concerns, likelihood of removal, military service, etc.

Morton Memos 2011

Morton Memos, 2011

Morton Memos provided that ICE should exercise discretion not to commence immigration actions against witnesses to and victims of crimes, individuals involved in civil rights efforts (e.g., nonczns complaining about housing or engaged in union activity).

Johnson Memo 2014

Policies for the Apprehension, Detention, and Removal of Undocumented Immigrants, Jeh Charles Johnson, Nov. 20, 2014

Recognizes that it’s not possible to remove all deportable persons in the U.S.

Encourages exercise of discretion early in removal process to maximize efficiency.

Priorities

  • Priority I: Threats to national security, border security, and public safety. Notably, this includes gang participation and nonczns convicted of an aggravated felony.
  • Priority 2: misdemeanants and new immigration violators. Focus on multiple offenders and nonczns convicted of a significant misdemeanor (e.g., domestic violence offense). Also new EWIs.
  • Priority 3: Nonczns issued a final order of removal after Jan. 2014.

Aside from priorities, encourages consideration of factors from Meissner Memo. Allows officials do depart from priorities if warranted.

AG Decisions 2018

AG Decisions limiting discretion

The Attorney General’s 2018 decision in Matter of Castro-Tum, 27 I & N Dec. 271, 274 (AG 2018), limiting the authority of immigration judges to administratively close cases, will correspondingly limit the discretion of DHS attorneys to terminate ongoing cases pending in immigration court.

Building on the reasoning in Castro-Tum, the Attorney General expressly stated in Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, 27 I & N Dec. 462 (AG 2018) that immigration judges have “no inherent authority to terminate or dismiss removal proceedings.”

Access to Justice

Adelante

Knoxville

This Case Study centers around Adelante, a nonprofit law firm and community legal education initiative based in Knoxville, Tennessee. Through participatory action research, Adelante seeks to unite deportation defense practitioners, noncitizens, and allies in crafting a collaborative, online platform to improve access to deportation defense.

1. Examine our Practices

5. Document Consequences

2. Critique Consequences

Participatory Action Research

3. Deliberate with Practitioners

4. Take Transformative Action

Build a community

Self-help guide

Form Automation

By Alejandra Palomo, Javier Corral, and Michael Caskey

By Tyler Demski and Ankitbhai Patel

Tailored Workshops on Demand

Training {aspiring} Lawyers

Any Questions?

email

arlene.amarante@lmunet.edu

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi